h a l f b a k e r yI heartily endorse this product and/or service.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
The traditional croissant is usually said to have been
invented by the French, but is nevertheless quite good.
(They didn't, but that's by the by.)
Howevertheless, regular eaters of croissants will have
noticed that the ends of the croissant "horn" can often
be a
little over-cooked, causing
them to shatter into shards
when touched by the butter-knife. This is an inevitable
consequence of the design - the innermost parts of the
fat
body of the croissant take longer to cook than the
thinner
tips.
The solution, as any good freelance consultant topologist
will tell you, is to be found in the torus.
Toroidal croissants are much harder to make than
croissant-shaped croissants, and this will probably be
completely beyond the French. One starts not with a
flat
triangle of pastry on a flat work surface, but instead
with a
sleeve of pastry wrapped around a vertical cylinder.
To form the toroidal croissant, the pastry is rolled down
the cylinder, turning out on itself, rather as one might
roll
down a stocking. Once it reaches the bottom (of the
cylinder, that is), the supporting cylinder is lifted out
and
the resulting toroidal croissant is baked.
The result is a doughnut-shaped yet still multilamellar
pastry, with a uniformly crisp outer surface and a
uniformly moist and springy interior.
Alternative design
http://www.turbosqu...not-3d-model/435280
A 'knot' design might be better - it has echoes of the original croissant shape whilst playfully suggesting 'pretzel' - and combines these virtue with the same lack of over-crispy pointed ends that [Max] highlights in his design. [hippo, Apr 25 2016]
Danish_20pastry_20grip_20points
[hippo, Apr 25 2016]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Unbelievably brilliant and it sounds so yummy. Are you sure
this isn't baked? Hmmm...Are you sure you're not French,
REALLY??? |
|
| |
Great idea, and does not appear to be baked though it would
only take about 15 minutes. [+] |
|
| |
If I'm not mistaken, this is already baked - it's called the cronut. |
|
| |
Interestingly, it was invented in America by a Frenchman. |
|
| |
And actually, going by the cross-section image on the Cronut wikipedia page, it doesn't seem to be manufactured by your method, so it seems different enough to be worth trying. |
|
| |
//it's called the cronut.// |
|
| |
Zut alors. Typical of the bloody French to go and
invent something like that before me. They only do
it to annoy. |
|
| |
I'd like to see the manufacturing process for 'toroidal knot' croissants, as in the linked picture. |
|
| |
I like the idea of a torroidal croissant, but not quite as much as the idea of a croissant-shaped bagel. |
|
| |
A taper isn't necessarily a bad thing, as it adds enough structure, in some cases, to support the entire croissant using only a finger and thumb grip at one of the horns. This way the finger-to-croissant interface is minimised, a practical benefit should you be eating one whilst overhauling the hydraulics on your robot, applying measured quantities of psychedelics to termites with a swab, or utilising public transport. |
|
| |
In short, a robust handle baked into the goods is a utilitarian feature that should only be meddled with with the utmost care, and only for the most genteel and sensitive palates unaccustomed to all but the moistest of morsels. |
|
| |
Suitably bunned - however, I'd conject that the humble croissant is that very linked-idea made flesh, in that the horns are there, "baked-in" so to speak, for the exact purpose of avoiding finger/bread transition scenarios. Sadly, I don't have the original patent specifications to hand for the initial croissant submission, but bearing in mind we're talking about France here, it's reasonable to surmise natural filth-management concessions would have carried significant weight in the original design brief. |
|
| |
Indeed, or some sort of croissant forceps (or in French "forceps croissant") might be a clever solution. |
|
| |
[Hippo] I like the toroidal knot. However, there is a
risk that if any French person were to see it, their
head would explode. |
|
| |
...and now the weather: there's a risk of clear skies, sunshine and light breezes tomorrow... |
|
| |
I must confess that although recently I was considering
alternative croissant shapes (I was considering a simple
extension, retaining the original crescent form, but about
as long as a baguette), I am struggling somewhat with the
idea of not being able to eat it by tearing off individual
segments, as is correct with a conventional croissant. How
would one know which end of the torus to start at?! |
|
| |
I think that that question can be answered only by
extended and repeated experimentation. |
|
| |
//I am struggling somewhat with the idea of not being able to eat it by tearing off individual segments, as is correct with a conventional croissant.// |
|
| |
Then perhaps I can draw your attention to the sacrilegious 'fishbone' croissant, which has individual pastry ribs. You can hold it by the head end; there are two slightly stiffened unglazed areas for thumb and forefinger where eyes would be. |
|
| |
[+] The idea title alone is sufficient for a bun, though the
yummy content makes it doubly deserved. |
|
| |
Naturally, I am now wondering how else this idea might be
used. |
|
| |
[+] The idea title alone is sufficient for a bun, though the
yummy content makes it doubly deserved. |
|
| |
Naturally, I am now wondering how else this idea might be
used. |
|
| |