h a l f b a k e r yExtruded? Are you sure?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
This is p much WKTE by everyone who's ever been in a caravan. The term usually used is macerator, rather than masticator. |
|
| |
Maybe the idea could be saved by making the toilet into a skinnable human head form, so you can shit into to the mouth of whoever you can model w/ your 3d printer and then have that toiletperson chew your toley. |
|
| |
A toilet that actually masticates material put into it might
be almost guaranteed clog-proof. Especially if it could spit
out stuff that can't be chewed (like, say, a tennis ball; a
friend of mine recently had to dismantle a toilet
installation to
discover that a tennis ball was clogging it). |
|
| |
I have a traumatic childhood experience involving something like this. It was in a hotel, I believe it was a "saniflo" toilet, I wasn't even the one using it and ended up in the mess. When this type of toilet breaks...shall we say... the shit hits the fan. |
|
| |
We have one. It's a terrible idea because if the power goes out you
can't flush the toilet and it's also a waste of electricity. Sorry. |
|
| |
hmm, I see a compromise; a manual masticator for when you can already see that the work of helping the toilet chew is going to be much less than the work of cleaning up the mess if you don't get the water line turned off quickly enough. |
|
| |
Manual mastication has always seemed like a good idea to me. I think. Is mastic that white sticky stuff? |
|
| |
Yes.
One does not simply chew into mortar. |
|
| |
Good point about the electricity. |
|
| |
"One does not simply chew into mortar."
[marked-for-tagline] |
|
| |
Did somebody say 'masturbater?' |
|
| |