h a l f b a k e r yNot so much a thought experiment as a single neuron misfire.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Bakeable .... the EMS could integrate RPM, idling (taxis do lots of that), hot running etc. and hash together a "thrash value" for the powerplant. |
|
|
But what vendor would want to present a potential purchaser with such information ? |
|
|
Somewhat baked in newer BMWs, which need servicing more often if driven hard. Just check the service history to deduce whether the car has been thrashed. |
|
|
I thought most cars these days with ECUs had a "time to next service indicator", not just BMWs. |
|
|
(separate note: at 3000rpm, in normal driving, a engine will amass nearly eleven million revolutions per hour. If it does 50,000km at an average 50km/hr, that would be eleven billion revolutions recorded on the thrashometer) |
|
|
Easily bakable but not always accurate unless you also include a timer, because I've driven in a lot of traffic which isn't that hard on the car, but would show up big on this meter. |
|
|
Yes, and it needs to factor in temperatures operated under and oil change frequency in order to present a full picture. |
|
|
Timers.. i love it! now we are getting somewhere. Doesnt seem so hard to put together a small computer that could coordinate all these thing in to an easy to read format. Does it? |
|
|
//because I've driven in a lot of traffic which isn't that hard on the car, but would show up big on this meter.// A combination of an RPM-ometer and a hours-in-operation meter would cover all the bases. Hours-in-operation meters are already common on stationary equipment and aircraft, shouldn't be too much of a stretch to see them on autos. |
|
|
It seems to me that revs per mile only indicates the gear used to travel said distance. If I drive down the motorway in fifth gear, I will use the same number of revs per mile whether I do 50 mph or 100 mph. If I do the same distance at 30mph, I will strain the engine a lot less but I will need third of forth gear and more revs. |
|
|
Maybe a better measure would be fuel used: |
|
|
Gear too low? - high fuel consumption |
|
|
Gear too high? - high fuel consumption |
|
|
Going very fast? - high fuel consumption |
|
|
Taking the slow road rather than the fast road? - Slightly higher fuel consumption but nowhere near what the increase in revs would suggest. |
|
|
Idling in traffic? - some fuel consumption but not much. |
|
|
Trying to do 0-30 mph in under 2 seconds? - High fuel consumption if there is a lot of stopping/starting on your journey |
|
|
It should also be pointed out that different engines can take different amounts of abuse. A sports car will happily do 5,000+ revs, treatment that would kill an economy car. So comparing two different cars would not be fair. |
|
| |