h a l f b a k e r yThese statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
a few feet from a person they appear to be wearing a dress or top
much nearer as you gaze upon them the slightly staggered fabric weave gives a transparent view a honeycomb fabric would do it
very flirty plus I noticed that this looking down girls shirts urge started sometime during Jr High thus
I think this speaks to a biological urge of some kind
NB .5b dress category urged
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
"My eyes aren't down here"
|
|
| |
"Yeah, well your tits aren't up there" |
|
| |
actually this could have the beneficial viewing angle at any polarization |
|
| |
that reminds me of velour you could make a reversible shirt where the velour pets up or down depending on which side you wear |
|
| |
So, the blinds would be partially closed, and when you're next to her you can see down through them, or up through them depending on the angle and your height. Or sideways blinds if you wish. Either way, the angle should be adjustable like regular blinds. That would have been much more interesting to read. The honeycomb thing makes very little sense. I think a honeycomb pattern would be, instead, easy to see through from far away and opaque up close. |
|
| |
Your matter-of-fact attitude towards tit peeking is a bit funny, and also creepy. All things considered, I can't vote. The idea should really include adjustable blinds and use them for analogy in the description. Unless I've totally misunderstood the concept which is virtually impossible. |
|
| |
on a new bikini form the blinkini |
|
| |
This might be a fun way to get the exposed nipple into common fashion.
— daseva, Oct 03 2006 |
|
| |
well sometimes we have share tastes I favor topless |
|
| |
// I noticed that this looking down girls shirts urge started sometime during Jr High thus I think this speaks to a biological urge of some kind // |
|
| |
Curious. You might be on to something. Deserves more study. |
|
| |
I had to log on just to vote no. |
|
| |
actually I noticed that the looking down girls shirts thing was mostly a 7th to 9th grade thing I was sort of amazed to remember that different forms n charms seemed to become charming at different 3 month periods I think it might actually be from a brain development process Truly I wondered at that I don't think I was derrier aware until college |
|
| |
even at my august age I would appreciate this kind of dress or top though or just nudity |
|
| |
I can pretty much guarantee that this will get buns from the boys and bones from the girls. |
|
| |
I'm in two minds on this. |
|
| |
It's badly written as ususal. But some women do like to show bits of themselves off. |
|
| |
This clothing is basically set up like horizontal venetian blinds, right?
It would be good for flashers - they could just unfurl themselves for a second. |
|
| |
//this will get buns from the boys and bones from the
girls.// You should work that up into a double entendre... |
|
| |
// You should work that up into a double entendre// |
|
| |
The girls would enjoy seeing a few boners around here? |
|
| |
Seriously, I think most girls would prefer the perverts to keep their distance. Why encourage them to stand right on top of the poor girls? |
|
| |
"The poor girls"? If you're choosing to wear a see-through dress with the express purpose to expose yourself to bystanders, dealing with the consequences seems only fair. (Besides, it's much easier to kick them in the nuts that way.) |
|
| |
We could take a routed fiber optics approach - looking at her knees you'd see breasts, and looking at her breasts you'd see legs. |
|
| |
Hell, let's go one step further and make it programmable with an optional randomizer mode. |
|
| |
"Keep watching, you might get lucky". |
|
| |
//looking at her knees you'd see breasts//
my lizard brain objects strenuously. |
|
| |
//kick them in the nuts//
I think I'll go with assuming that was not meant literally. |
|
| |
//this speaks to a biological urge of some kind// |
|
| |
Not necessarily. It may just be that, like me, you took a long time to learn the idea of personal space. Combine that with curiosity, chutzpah and an innocent pleasure in soft things, and we've got your 'biological urge' right here. |
|
| |
Also, read The Naked Ape for some startling evidence of how nurture-driven is the sexual behaviour of big primates (not just us but also chimps). |
|
| |
If women wore this top, they'd still get mad at guys for looking. As it is, they wear low-cut tops and hang shiny, dangly jewelry between their neck and their cleavage, and then they expect us not to look there. Go figure! |
|
| |
The day I understand that is the day my wife understands why I like fishing. To be honest it's probably more fun to keep each other guessing. |
|
| |
//// kick them in the nuts//
// I think I'll go with assuming that was not meant
literally.
Why not? It's an effective defense. If the assailant was,
for
instance, carrying a large bag of pecans, macademias, or
hazelnuts for
an Italian panforte, they would certainly be distracted by
finding those scattered across the pavement as the result
of
a Shaolin jump-kick. While they pick up the macadamias,
you
make your getaway. I'm thinking of something in a
thatched
hut. |
|
| |
You could practise on one of those dangly bird-feeders. Then you wouldn't have to retrieve the nuts between attempts. |
|
| |
Not the panforte! Anything but the panforte - Although, thinking about it, the panforte's natural density should protect the nuts from any foot/pavement incurred chafing. |
|
| |
[Jutta], funniest anno eva! |
|
| |
"I'm thinking of something in a thatched hut."
{groan} |
|
| |