h a l f b a k e r yWhy not imagine it in a way that works?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I think in the end it would make little difference, the damage would still be done one way or t'other. Keep in mind, no one drives a stove down the road at 80 mph. At least no one that I know. |
|
|
I doubt that there is much difference in the two processes. In fact, I think that the automotive finishes are probably more durable, especially the more recent systems. |
|
|
If you kept your car in the kitchen all the time I think the finish would be as nice as the stove after 15 years. |
|
|
You haven't seen my cooking! ;) |
|
|
Wouldn't work. Surface on appliances is vitreous porcelain enamel, (glass). Requires a very special sort of steel to work properly. Not to mention the enamel is very heavy, wouldn't work with zinc coatings, and is much more expensive that standard paint, I could go on but won't. Powder coating is a closer animal to the process, and has automotive applications. But you are right that the finish is much more durable. Your windshield has roughly the same durability outside as the finish on your stove would. |
|
|
Ah. I stand corrected. I assumed (incorrectly and without checking) that appliances were painted with a thermo-setting urethane enamel similar to many cars. That they were porcelainized never crossed my mind. But, knowing that when an appliance does get chipped the result is, usually, a big, sharp-edged and deep chunk, I should have guessed. |
|
|
I knew it! I knew that there had to be a difference in the
process because I could never get away with placing a
hot pan on the hood of my car without serious
discoloration at the least. |
|
| |