h a l f b a k e r ySugar and spice and unfettered insensibility.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Ordinary Scrabble has set values and numbers of tiles per language. This is less interesting than a potential service you could sign up to.
Once a month, the usual number of light-sensitive sets of scrabble tiles arrive in the post. However, the frequency distribution of the letters is random, as
are the values of each letter, although each type of letter has the same value. Hence you might get a lot of Z's with low values, which makes it easier to play the Polish version, for example, but not, say, the English version. Also, on exposure to light, the tiles gradually fade until the letters and values have disappeared. You then return the set in the pre-paid envelope to be reprinted.
This changes the game. One can acquire specific skills on a specific set over the month which will then be less useful in the next month, and an element of luck is introduced, somewhat like gambling but less effective at emptying one's bank account. One might, though, acquire more general skills. The actual experience Scrabble players gain becomes less useful.
[link]
|
|
"which makes it easier to play the Polish version, for example, but not, say, the English version."
would you extend this to languages with different alphabets?
at some point casual observers would assume you were playing Mah Jong |
|
|
Oh, good idea! Yes, but consistent with each script. Not with, for example, mixed Telugu and Georgian. |
|
|
I think the light-sensitivity and sending sets back and forward is unnecessary and unreliable.
You might as well give everybody a full set of tiles, and just tell people which ones to use each month. |
|
|
Also, if you vary things too much, the game will be shit.
In the official version, there are lots tiles for frequently used letters and they score low, and the harder to play rare letters score high. This balances the game. Move too far away from that and you're basically picking a winner on luck of the first draw or two. People's hands will fill up with single-point 'Z's, the game will bog down very quickly. It would end up feeling like monopoly. |
|
|
I found an image of the tile set to get a distribution:
letter count score
A 9 1
B 2 3
C 2 3
D 4 2
E 12 1
F 2 4
G 3 2
H 2 4
I 9 1
J 1 8
K 1 5
L 4 1
M 2 3
N 6 1
O 8 1
P 2 3
Q 1 10
R 6 1
S 4 1
T 6 1
U 4 1
V 2 4
W 2 4
X 1 8
Y 2 4
Z 1 10 |
|
|
//Also, if you vary things too much, the game will be shit// |
|
|
The game being discussed is Scrabble. It cant get any shitter whatever way you fiddle with the rules. |
|
| |