Teacher-based Selective Education

(This is from a UK-based perspective, my apologies where required..)

For those societies which are ideologically meritocracies, such as the UK, selective, competitive, education is in principle a good thing. Those schools taking exclusively more able students are able to proceed at a greater rate, and in an atmosphere of greater respect for learning, than a comprehensive school (where students of all abilities are mixed). And all students can be taught in a manner best suiting their abilities.

Problems arrive in the selection process, which has always taken the form of an exam (usually around age 11). This is considered heartless, too great a pressure for children of that age, liable to make great omissions, etc. Also, crucially, better off parents are able to ensure their child has better preparation and so this perpetuates the class divides that the selection by merit aims to destroy.

So, I propose a model of selective education whereby primary schools are allocated a set number of places to local 'upper tier' schools (i.e. grammar schools). Pupils are chosen to fill those places by a committee of relevant teachers and staff, who can take account of the entire history of a pupil's learning and all relevant issues. Schools may wish to use exam/test results to aid their decisions, this is at their discretion. Prejudiced decisions are avoided by the use of a commitee, and perhaps by requiring a statement of reasoning justifying the selection/rejection of those on the shortlist, for independent auditing.

Problem solved.