h a l f b a k e r yCaution! Contents may be not!
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
"A flexible rear wing provides important downforce on the corners without significantly increasing drag on the straightaways. But overly flexible wings are illegal. McLaren, after learning that Ferrari was bending the rules, complained about a slot gap in Ferrari's rear wing that flexed closed at top speeds."
'Grand Theft Auto' (an article about industrial espionage between Ferrari and McLaren racing)
Wired magazine, June 2008, p187 |
|
|
Would not a wing that responded to the amount of airflow passing over it be, by definition an Active Aerodynamic device? |
|
|
Flexing wings is not allowed by the FIA. There was a big to do in 2006 when on board pics of the Ferrari showed the wings flexing. |
|
|
The FIA load tests all wings to make sure they don't flex any major amount. |
|
|
Passive as well as active aids are not allowed. |
|
|
The high up suspension mounted wings on 60's F1 cars were cable controlld by the driver so they could be flattened out on straights, and increaesed for corners. |
|
|
Even the mass damper system developed by Renault, which is a weighted spring inside the car, was outlawed because it helped keep the car level over curbs, increasing aero effeciency. |
|
|
So again, baked, and explicitly not allowed by the current rules. |
|
|
Read up on the coming 2009-2011 regs, there is room for more aero adjustment I think. |
|
| |