h a l f b a k e r yStill more entertaining than cricket.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
A competition between teams or individuals to find the greatest pedant(s); and hopefully further the noble cause of pedantry amongst the wider population.
I suggest using 1st editions of the grauniad as a standard competition text. A crack team of Oxford University Pedantry PhD’s examine selected
copies of the newspaper at length and determine as scientifically as possible all typos, punctuation mistakes etc. Competitors are given a fixed time in which to find and correct as many as they can. Played by knockout or league style tournaments. In later rounds one may chose to use some of one's time allowance to search for mistakes in competitors' previous answers, earning double points for any found.
I envision this as a primarily non-contact sport. Winner gets a biscuit.
Apologies to anyone who was hoping for an exacting technical discussion about the classification of amphetamine derivatives.
grauniad
http://www.urbandic...p?term=grauniad&r=f
[rainbow, Dec 25 2005]
Help Group
Pedants_20Anonymous
My inspiration. So, so funny. [rainbow, Dec 27 2005]
[link]
|
| |
Welcome to the 'bakery [rainbow].
Congratulations on posting your first
idea about one of the 'bakery's favourite
subjects and not mentioning custard or
ninjas. |
|
| |
// A competition between teams or
individuals to find the greatest pedant
(s); and hopefully further the noble
cause of pedantry amongst the wider
population. // |
|
| |
This is a competition between teams or
individuals to find the greatest pedant
or pedants. It should hopefully further
the noble art of pedantry amongst the
wider population. |
|
| |
// I suggest using 1st editions of the
grauniad as a standard competition
text. A crack team of Oxford University
Pedantry PhD’s examine selected copies
of the newspaper at length and
determine as scientifically as possible
all typos, punctuation mistakes etc.// |
|
| |
I suggest using 1st editions of The
Guardian (a UK based daily newspaper)
as a standard competition text. A crack
team of Oxford University post-
doctorates, with PhDs in pedantry,
examine selected copies of the
newspaper at length to identify all
errors of typing or punctuation as
thoroughly as possible. |
|
| |
Unfortunately, ideas concerned with
pedantry, deserve a pedant's reposte.
I got bored writing mine. Indeed, you're
probably bored reading it. |
|
| |
I think we must permit [rainbow]'s use of "the grauniad", as it has come into common usage, particularly within the intended context. I think, however, it should have been in title case, since there is sufficient specificity to apply as a proper noun. I'll just take my highlighter to the fourth sentence of the second paragraph, which is only a fragment. And I'll take a four-point muggins bonus off [jonthegeologist]'s "pendants reposte", which now has "pedant's riposte" scribbled next to it. |
|
| |
I think it's a good thing to play this electronically, at some remove; helps to enforce the "non-contact" part. (I know, you said "primarily", but since I was always the kid that the wimps beat up when frustrated, I take it to heart.) However, that would require the winner to get a digital biscuit, which on my side of the Atlantic would be a "cookie", and wouldn't be much of a prize. |
|
| |
I like it. Thank you, [rainbow]. Hello, [Ian], [jon]. Merry Christmas, all! |
|
| |
Beep! May I challenge "a four-point muggins bonus", for a double or quits bonus? |
|
| |
One of my favorite memories from high school is of two English teachers in a shouting match over my grammar in a Sterling Scholar portfolio. |
|
| |
[two English teachers in a shouting match ] |
|
| |
That's a pleasant bit of imagery. Thanks, [lurch]. |
|
| |
"who is the greatest"... - should that not be "whom is the
greater"? |
|
| |
"takes the biscuit"..... I once had my version of the origin
of that phrase published in the Guardian - like to hear it
sometime? (+) |
|
| |
[rainbow] "Winner gets a biscuit" Surely, "Winner is awarded a biscuit"? -1 |
|
| |
[Ian] Use of single apostrophes is for quotation within quotation. -2. Unless you were using the american system; -4 to me. |
|
| |
[jonthegeologist] 'bakery or Bakery? Incorrect spacing "post- doctorates". Five currently uncorrected spellings of pedant. -7 |
|
| |
[lurch] You had the yellow jersey, briefly. |
|
| |
[xenzag] Capital letter missing in "the Guardian". Sailing very close to the wind with your question mark placement and extended ellipsis but can't quite pin you down. -1 |
|
| |
Yes to please grauniad story. |
|
| |
corrected now [rainbow]. One presumes
that the negative seven points previously
awarded are now rescinded? |
|
| |
No, but you are still beating me. |
|
| |
"further .... amongst" That, is simply ponderous.
"are given" -- ponderous: receive |
|
| |
The following suffixes, in order of use:
tion … ly … ing … ed … ly … ed … ing … ly … ing … tion
are insufferable. |
|
| |
This idea is... so strange that it needs a bun... |
|
| |
This kinda reminds me of some science books that I borrowed from a library. The foreword of the book (written by the author), claimed that in the book (A4-sized with about 300-450 pages, although a few pages had cartoons) there were three grammatical errors, and the first five people who could get them all and sent them in would get a free, author-signed copy of his next book. |
|
| |
That book would be great for this, I reckon... |
|
| |
I would have thought 'objectively' would be a better method than simple 'scientifically' checking for errors. (+) |
|
| |
I prefer 'by whatever means they contrive' instead of scientifically or objectively. Hell, leave it all out! They're experts (PhD's), whatever, they must know how. |
|
| |
//Pedantry PhD’s // My understanding of Oxbridge PhDs is that they are not awarded in a particular subject, unlike bachelor degrees, and so a "Pedantry PhD" cannot exist. |
|
| |
for rainbow - The origin of the phrase "Taking The
Biscuit" (1995) |
|
| |
The origin of this phrase lies in the strict protocol
observed in the early to late middle ages at the royal
court, especially in matters concerning food. With so
much fear over the real prospect of food poisoning,
particularly by badly stored meat, it was customary for
the head of the table to be offered first choice rather
than having food served directly served unto his/her
plate, leading to this custom being afforded as an honour
to a special guest to: "take the best cut". In time this
action became corrupted to the phrase "taking the
biscuit" |
|
| |