h a l f b a k e r yRecalculations place it at 0.4999.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
if it is vibration of air molecules, let's consider piezoelectric pwoer generator. whatever small be the magnitude of power generated, it would be energy recovery. also if you remove the silencer,you may (or may not be able to) listen to the noise produced by engine. |
|
|
If the output is at 120 dB, thats equivalent to one watt per square meterin other words, nada. (see link) |
|
|
if 1 watt per sq metre can be generated with 120 dB, imagine about railway tracks and the rattling sound due to gap kept at regular intervals for expansion.this situation still exists in many countries & not going to change in near future. any estimate about the noise level due to rattling & the weight of piezo system per watt generation capacity ? |
|
|
Unless you measure it at the wheel itself, the clack of a train is a whole lot less than 120 dB, with the sonic energy proportionally less. And what you could somehow extract will be a minute part of that. So the whole notion is unworkable. |
|
|
I think it's easier to see that next to no energy comes from sound by the fact that such little energy is necessary tomake sound. You can nick a bell with your fingernail and it's audible for a hundred feet, but your finger hardly even notices the energy lost in the nick. |
|
|
[cheekio]excellent explanation using simple example. i highly appreciate that. |
|
| |