h a l f b a k e r ySuperficial Intelligence
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Using a smartphone-based digital assistant to identify a song playing in the background has been around for many years now. This idea takes that a step further: to start PLAYING the song in sync with the background music by pre-fetching the music file and skipping to the exact same point in the song
as the source in the background it's listening to, then cranking on the volume.
[link]
|
| |
Why is this desirable when clearly the song is already playing? |
|
| |
Because the song playing might just be a few seconds of the song playing as background to a commercial or something |
|
| |
//might just be a few seconds//
Then how can it sync with it for the whole song¿
Apologies for syncing(sic) to such a pedantic level, but I think this aspect of the design should be considered.. |
|
| |
//might just be a few seconds//
Then how can it sync with it for the whole song¿
Apologies for syncing(sic) to such a pedantic level, but I think this aspect of the design should be considered...Let that sync in. |
|
| |
Baked. iTunes match + Shazam. |
|
| |
High praise from you, a1. You got it exactly right. |
|
| |
//syncing(sic) to such a pedantic level// |
|
| |
"syncing[sic] to such a pedantic level" |
|
| |
"But" is used to present conflicting information. You want "and" or "so". |
|
| |