h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Everyone knows how sharks have skin that's smooth one way and rough the other, yes? Those swimsuits caused a bit of controversy if I remember rightly when they first appeared (linky).
So, it occurred to me the other day that if the road surface was textured in a similar way to a shark's skin, it would
aid grip and shorten stopping distances.
The way I envisage it is as a series of tiny points, all sloping in one direction. If they pointed against the direction of travel, then they would give extra grip when the brakes were applied, which would shorten stopping distances. The "normal" characteristics of the road (ie: when accelerating or travelling at a constant speed) wouldn't be affected - I'm not proposing a road which has no grip except for in one direction, just a road which has extra grip in one direction.
Similarly, if the points were pointed towards the inside of a corner, then lateral force would be increased, enabling the car to corner more safely.
I'm not talking about huge spikes which would tear tyres apart within a few miles - however I'm sure there would still be a tyre wear issue, so maybe these would best be restricted to high-risk areas, such as tricky bends or on the run up to junctions.
As I type, it's just occurred to me that anyone falling off a motorcycle would be sliding in the wrong direction and so there would maybe be a greater injury risk - all the more reason for selective use. I'm sure someone on here could explain whether it's better for a (non-leathered up) motorcyclist to slide quickly to a halt on a rough surface or slowly to a halt on a slippery surface?
Sharkskin swimwear
http://news.bbc.co....3520000/3520472.stm
As mentioned in my first paragraph. [kmlabs, Mar 15 2006]
As rough as you want it, baby.
http://www.ltsa.gov.../road-surface2.html
I have never seen anything like it anywhere else outside NZ, Australia and South Africa. This thing is mean. [methinksnot, Mar 15 2006]
Shark car
http://www.lots-tra.../cmc_shark_car.html
for [po] [methinksnot, Mar 15 2006]
Prismo Suregrip 924
http://www.prismogr...com/index.php?id=81
[mecotterill, Feb 08 2008]
[link]
|
| |
Or you could put the points on the wheels? |
|
| |
//Everyone knows how sharks have skin that's smooth one way and rough the other// learn something every day! is that why they can't reverse easily? |
|
| |
Or park, sharks can't park. |
|
| |
Park their cars, silly [po]. Linky |
|
| |
who you calling silly? your snotty name has been putting me off for days... |
|
| |
Do you want me to change it? I've grown somewhat attached to it, given the modest successes I've had with The Whibble and The Scrotchword, but nothing is too much for you; my dear [po]. |
|
| |
It was really [DrCurry] that started this snot business. |
|
| |
[BB] baby, it's a free interpretation username. Much like ballet dancing to "Wayfaring Stranger". |
|
| |
I'm sorry to hear you got hit in the face with a cabbage. We'll find the bastards. |
|
| |
[methinksnot], I've nothing to say of your name, but you misspelled "whibble." |
|
| |
As for this idea, the car may stop too quickly (head injury & whiplash) may catch on the denticles and flip forward (in the case of those European, laterally stunted, longitudinally heightened compacts, and of course, for any lost stopping time, you will have gained acceleration time on the slippery roads. |
|
| |
And one of my ideas too, how embarrassing. |
|
| |
It has been corrected now. |
|
| |
[jellydoughnut] I'm not proposing extreme grip/no grip, just a very slight increase in available grip when you really need it - let's face it, stopping quickly with your brakes isn't as much of a whiplash risk as crashing into another car. Also, I don't propose that the grip is hugely reduced if you go against the direction of the denticles - for one thing, that would make overtaking an extremely hazardous pastime. |
|
| |
[zeno] if you put the points on the wheels then you wouldn't be able to angle them towards the inside of a corner. I also think there'd be an issue with tearing up the road... |
|
| |
I think this may be baked already, there is
something they put on the approach to
roundabouts and slip-roads here in the
UK which is an anti-skid surface. |
|
| |