h a l f b a k e r yNot so much a thought experiment as a single neuron misfire.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I think this is a fantastic idea, the number of times our 18 month old has crawled back out of the x-ray machine and we've had to strap him to a piece of hand luggage just to get him through...I can tell you this would be a real boon.
Of course, the other option is simply to check them in the hold in their car seat. This way, even if they do cry, you don't hear them! |
|
|
"both INCREASES harmful radiation and stops the child from crying" ? |
|
|
Or maybe just a seperate airline for babies? After 90 mins of `waaaaaaah` (babytalk for `i`m in a plane..i`m in a plane`) you tend to get the idea! |
|
|
If only terrorists would stop packing explosives in their babies, we wouldn't need this. |
|
|
I just send ours Fed-Ex so it arrives around the same time we do. |
|
|
There has been a glut of fake animatronic babies smuggling all types of hidden nasties where I fly. It's compulsory. |
|
|
Shouldn't this idea be posted under "public: evil air
travel"? |
|
|
Just for a second there benfrost, I almost thought you were serious. |
|
|
I think this is the funniest thing I have ever read, and [StarChaser], that is the funniest link I have ever seen. Cheers. |
|
|
Pallex: I'm with you, dude. If smoking is considered too anti-social for planes, I say we ban rugrats too. How many times have you prayed for that mewling, puking, noise-machine to just play a little harder with the emergency door handle? |
|
| |