h a l f b a k e r yRomantic, but doomed to fail.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Radiation
Using Radioactive Waste Sites for Power Generation | |
Apparently they have already developed batteries that run off of radioactive materials, but we still have a huge amount of radioactive waste to dispose of. Currently a disposal site is being developed in nevada/utah to hold the material. The ground around it is supposed to heat up to 140-150 degrees
over the next few decades and retain that temperature for the next few thousand years, minimum.
With NASA's new technological breakthrough's in the Stirling Engine, a closed one, sitting right on the site would be capable of producing electricity for decades (centuries) with no maintenance required, (a desirable trait in that environment). By creating a large array of these engines, sufficient power could be created to run at least a portion of our current demands, at minimal cost. With the decrease in cost attributed to large scale production, these units could also be installed over geologically active hot spots for a small investement cost.
If adequate shielding were developed, smaller powerplants would be feasible for remote locations. All a stirling engine needs is a heat source, and with large quantities of radioactive waste available, all that is required is a safe means of translating that heat to power.
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/tmsb/stirling.html
yell at your government representatives to make this a priority.
mak
Nuclear sandwich battery
http://www.halfbake...0sandwich_20battery Hold the mayo. [Amos Kito, Oct 04 2004]
Berkely Study on Thermal Effects
http://www-esd.lbl....ts/thermalload.html here is a link to the site that delineates the thermal effects. [makulais, Oct 04 2004]
Stirling convertor link from the article.
http://www.grc.nasa.../tmsb/stirling.html (Use [link] to create these, don't put URLs into your main text. Thanks!) [jutta] [Worldgineer, Oct 04 2004]
[link]
|
|
An idea I had along these same lines would be to locate "geothermal" energy plants over those perpetual coal fires in Pennsylvania. Technically, this, as well as buried waste, is all "geothermal". |
|
|
I'd like a link for information on this site in Nevada/Utah for the dump. Specifically, something that mentions the ground warming significantly. |
|
|
[UB]: The only problem with putting the things on top of every parliamentary chamber, is that we'd only get power a few days out of the year. |
|
|
I'm sorry, I did not correctly remember the temperature rise, I had seen it on a television special a year or so ago. The temperature is expected to rise to 97 degrees celcius! Here is a link to the berkeley study. |
|
|
Yes but that 97°C never reaches the surface and what heat gets near the surface takes a while to get there. Can we build a water loop in the ground that will last 10,000 years? |
|
|
Just make it out of teflon. |
|
|
Radioactive waste would be contained better, too. |
|
| |