h a l f b a k e r yThe mutter of invention.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Many kids master the art of pedaling before they develop a healthy respect for danger. It's not always possible to chase them down before they careen into a screen door, glass panel or into the path of a bus.
I propose a simple fail-safe R/C brake that would prevent Jr from getting too far (outside
radio range) and would instantly stop him/her in moments of parental terror.
The transmitter would probably be on a belt clip with a rip-cord type switch.
[link]
|
| |
I imagine this would not be a locking-type brake. Nothing like stopping junior after he has a chance to drive into the exact centre of the road, and then forcing him to stay there till you get him. |
|
| |
If it is used as a wireless fence it will be automatic. The brakes engage before they go into the road. + |
|
| |
Yes, I like the wireless fence
method too. + |
|
| |
Wireless fence... don't these normally employ mild electric shocks? |
|
| |
[FM] - On dog collars that’s true. I’m suggesting that the transmitter be in a fixed position (with adjustable wattage) while retaining your emergency rip-cord belt attachment. No zapping - only stopping. |
|
| |
As described, your child’s range of motion is limited by your proximity to them. If you’re standing closer to the street, they can pedal into the street. Chasing them will increase their potential distance. Pulling the cord once they have done so leads to [Cedar Park]’s scenario. |
|
| |
I think the main transmitter should be stationary, maybe a clip on for railings or something. |
|
| |
//Wireless fence... don't these normally employ mild electric shocks?//
You say that like it's a bad thing. |
|
| |
and you say that like saying that is a bad thing is a bad thing. |
|
| |
and you say... oh never mind. |
|
| |