h a l f b a k e r yNice swing, no follow-through.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I don't have fond memories of parking meters, but to add to your idea I might suggest that the meter counts down the minutes until zero, then displays the value of the fine as an ever increasing number. |
|
|
Using a digital meter, the fine could be varied according to the number of empty parking spots; time of day and so on. |
|
|
I'm bunning it, but I like [Ling]'s version better. |
|
|
I agree. Proportional meter fines will encourage people to move their car sooner. Most times when a driver goes past their time and gets a ticket, 9 times out of 10 they will say, "screw it" and wont bother moving or putting more money in the meter since they already got the $50 ticket. |
|
|
At least if it the cost of parking went from $2 for 30 minutes to $1 per minute they are more likely to take action. |
|
|
This, or at least [Ling]'s variation is a much fairer way of doing things, which is probably exactly why municipal authorities haven't adopted it. Parking fines are a nice revenue stream and I would guess they've worked out that they accrue more money by charging everyone a flat fee, rather than billing offenders proportionally.
Wankers! |
|
|
Really [DocBrown], I'm sure they have your best interests at heart... |
|
|
Puh! [wags]. Double puh and thrice puh! I'm sorry, I got fined the other day and the wound is still fresh. |
|
|
It wouldn't be too hard to modify the charge/min to give a revenue neutral scheme.
Although there may well have to be a small initial step to cover the cost of administration. |
|
|
Ling, cities often change fine rates. Unless there was a simple way to change it on every meter, it would be easier just to let the cops figure it out when they write the ticket. |
|
| |