h a l f b a k e r yLike gliding backwards through porridge.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
| |
Graaains... Graaaaaaaaaains... |
|
| |
It all depends on what you decide is "modern". |
|
| |
Prehistoric cereal might consist of coarsely ground seed kernels. |
|
| |
Pre-Raphaelite cereal would break from classical serving suggestions. |
|
| |
Futurist cereal would have a big cubist picture of the common man (or woman) triumphantly lifting their bowl infront of a stylised dawn of a new age - stickers found inside the box might feature bold geometric iconry. Like a big Nazi version of the Quaker-Oats Scotsman. |
|
| |
Brit-Art cereal would come in an inside-out cereal box, filled with concrete, sectioned to expose a rotting lamb, sawn in half, covered in bees. |
|
| |
On a bed soaked in piss and littered with used
syringes and condoms? |
|
| |
Also thinking of prehistoric cereal in various degrees, e.g. spores because seed plants have yet to evolve. |
|
| |
So had grass... which kinda rules out cereal. |
|
| |
Ah, but what's ancestral to it? Maybe sedges? And then back through basal angiosperms to spore-bearing plants. Eventually you'd just be drinking primordial soup. |
|
| |
Even farther back and you'll be eating STARS. That'd be sweet... |
|
| |
//Like a big Nazi version of the Quaker-Oats Scotsman// |
|
| |