h a l f b a k e r yNo, not that kind of baked.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's just too stupid? |
|
|
maybe they just did. Or maybe you just stole MY idea. |
|
|
Uhm Im not sure I follow your logic. Poppet valves open and close they have no linkage and so cannot really be used in a power application. They also do not seal throughout their range of motion and so only seal when in the closed position. Perhaps I am misunderstanding but I do not believe it would be possible for this to work. |
|
|
A poppet valve is a nice, lightweight bit of metal, easy to fling back and forth. Using a piston to seal the opening requires: |
|
|
-More mass in the form of an extended cylinder skirt that keeps the piston aligned at full extension |
|
|
-Piston rings, if you want a good seal. But how do you compress them when the piston slides back in? Maybe just machine it out of solid graphite. Good luck with that, by the way. |
|
|
-Lubrication of the piston. Tricky. Ooh, emissions bad, and lossy too. On the upside, the oil changes itself, you just add a quart every 500 miles. |
|
|
This idea has a few merits: |
|
|
-The extended cylinder skirt and opening need not be symmetrical, thus shooting the charge into the firing cylinder in whatever direction you choose. |
|
|
-The cylinder valve can be driven with a crank instead of a cam - how far the piston has to travel to open the valve duplicates the function of the cam's extended low spot. |
|
|
-Crank drive means no valve float even at F1 speeds. A thrown conrod maybe, but no float. |
|
|
-More exciting backandforthy stuff to look at. |
|
| |