h a l f b a k e r yI like this idea, only I think it should be run by the government.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Rich people would do this, instead of getting a pet from the Humane Society and investing the time and love to make it the best they'd ever had. |
|
|
I had a pet sperm, but it died. |
|
|
awww. I thought this was a 'Sea-Monkeys' idea. |
|
|
Okay, I just petted my sperm bank. It felt good. |
|
|
If your pet turns out to be "the best pet you've ever had," you clone the thing, not breed it. |
|
|
Hellooo! Dolly!, Well Helloo! Dolly!. |
|
|
You can always rely on your pet sperm to wag its tail. |
|
|
Well, this is pretty well baked, but I'm in support of the idea. [DrCurry], let's see now... sperm bank or cloning? Honestly, that's a little like saying, I need bread from the store, I guess I'll take the helicopter. Geez. |
|
|
Besides, a recent experiment of cloning a deer resulted in animal personalities COMPLETELY different from each other. There are generally problems with the clones given the current state of the art. "Dolly" had a lot of health problems that were unanticipated. |
|
|
Nope. I'd rather breed than clone. Cheaper (by SEVERAL orders of magnitude) and much healthier results. |
|
|
I'd rather breed than clone? Yes, but for aesthetic reasons. |
|
|
why is everyone talking about clones? The idea only calls for artifical fertilization. |
|
|
dunno, but there's always more prospective pets than there are prospective owners and temperament seems to be more or less evenly distributed within a breed regardless of heredity, so [-] |
|
| |