h a l f b a k e r yLoading tagline ....
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
The idea is simply to provide passive, sign-only
certificates
for sites that don't need encryption.
An online newspaper is a great example case. They serve
mostly static content and could easily sign their static
pages.
Advantages
-saves crypto overhead
-untrusted third party can do
hosting
Disadvantages
-only works for static content
code signing certificates
http://www.google.c...igning+certificates
Google search shows many results [RichardT, Oct 02 2011]
html signing certificates ?
http://www.google.c...signing+certificate
No relevant results found, mostly stuff about doing SSL without getting a certificate from verisign etc [RichardT, Oct 02 2011]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
One day in the future, everything will be digitally signed. It's just one of those things that makes sense. |
|
| |