h a l f b a k e r yAlas, poor spelling!
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Divert hot air from the jet exhaust to a big hot air balloon floating high above the aeroplane. Then the jets only have to provide forward thrust, not lift.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
How big? Did you do any sums? |
|
|
140.000kg Jetliner, 3 cubic_metres of air at 120° to lift a kg -> 420.000 cubic metres of very hot air,heated by jet turbines that are trying to drag it along... |
|
|
Congrats,your idea just topped the size of the biggest airship ever, which had only 200.000m3 |
|
|
Also, the plane would have to carry extra fuel to overcome
the drag from the balloon. |
|
|
The Hullaballoon lends itself to fast, aerodynamic flight, but I think not in the range normally used by a jet engine. |
|
|
Also, if you divert hot air from the jet exhaust to a balloon, you rob it of thrust. Also, jet engines are highly inefficient for low speed flight. |
|
|
Perhaps generalised to 'use the waste heat from the engines to provide the hot air in a hot air dirigible' there might be more scope for this to work. |
|
|
A hullaballoon, averaged by volume, might actually move backwards. Kind of. |
|
|
Well, ya can't say it's not half baked. |
|
|
This is the 'Crazy Eddie'est idea I've seen in my
short time on this site. In addition, it comes
swiftly to the point, which I like. Further, it's
pointless, which I'm coming to enjoy. |
|
|
However, even pointlessness must have a limit,
and here, that limit been exceeded -- nay,
trashed...maybe even smithereened. |
|
|
Kudos, hippo. Enjoy your fish. |
|
|
[sm] a hullaballoon isn't going to move backwards, the lifting medium (H2 or He) has to be transferred from the collapsing balloonettes to the expanding ones... movement-wise it's totally an air tractor. |
|
| |