h a l f b a k e r yThese statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Ok guys, we have heard of all kinds of methods of birth control and preventing diseases. It's time for the ultimate new way to have sex. Instead of a condom, these are fitted caps that just go over the tip of the penis. They still have the little area for the sperm. Same material, just covering less
surface so that the pleasure is still there. No more of those slam your dick in the door and still not feel anything condoms. They are fitted by a doctor, similar to the way women obtain birth control, and then you can order them as necessary.
(?) newbies paradise
http://www.halfbake...m/category/Other_3a [po, Apr 09 2005]
[link]
|
|
I can't imagine how it stays attached. Nor can I imagine what kind of condom you are used to. It must be inches thick. There are other options, you know. |
|
|
i think it's a great idea...but the problem still lies in keeping it on!If it was kept on, yes, as a woman i don't like rubber!..yuck!if already invented, fine, but re-invent problem free. i don't think pleasure is over-rated..that's what it is all about!..if we can put a man on the moon, surely we can put a man and woman in (heaven)..humor there, but..really!..got my vote..:) |
|
|
The Female Condom. Same (if not more) STD and pregnancy protection, not constrictive to the male, transfers heat better than latex, comes with its own pouch of extra lube. Pricier but super fun! Sounds MUCH better than the "glans cap" suggested... |
|
|
I saw the original idea a long time ago. They were sold for purposes of desensitizing the male to allow him to last longer, not for pregancy protection, as they leak. Was called 'Stubs' or something like that. I haven't seen them in years, though. |
|
|
and I was hoping that this was a protest about the recent list having just filled up with condom ideas... |
|
|
The most recent anotation for this one was 11th of april... WHY is this on the recent list? |
|
|
You know what's weird? Those Trojan commericals, and pretty much the entire condom business, and how they emphasize the sensitivity of the condom, and how it'll provide a better feel. Some Japanese condom manufacturers have even made their condoms even thinner. Goddang it, I don't care about sensitivity! I'll probably come even if the condom is as thick as a roll of insulation! What I care about is: Do they protect well?!?! That's what I think Trojan should advertise. By the way, I love all those Trojan commercials with Ronald McDonald's hand in it. |
|
|
Hm, learning something new any moment. Trojan ? Condoms? Trojan as in the horse ? Odd. |
|
|
Trojan is a big manufacturer in the US, so much so that 'trojan' has half become a generic name. Being at work, I don't want to go opening any sites of happy little naughty bits in their raincoats, but it shouldn't be too hard to find. |
|
|
Lambskin condoms feel perfectly natural for both partners. The experts
feel that latex is safer, but the ones I have talked to say they have never
actually tested that hypothesis. Certainly they are safer than going
bareback. |
|
|
Qwackspeke- I wish to be listed on your profile, or do intentional misspellings not count? |
|
|
StarChaser, I understand - something like ACME. But in my imagination I saw a Trojan Horse galloping away covered in a huge condom and .. uhm ... we'll leave it unopened. |
|
|
condoms made from synthetic spiders webbing
very strong and soft |
|
|
Spiderweb isn't soft. I've been cut by the support strands of a banana spider's web before... |
|
|
I'm talking common english garden spider |
|
|
The vagina is my favorite kind of condom. |
|
|
there are other things in life beside condoms... |
|
| |