h a l f b a k e r yOK, we're here. Now what?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Multispace font
Combines the best features of monospace and non-monospace fonts | |
Monospace fonts are useful for things like ASCII art and aligning tables, but not very aesthetically pleasing, and therefore not favored for reports and the like.
non-monospace fonts look good (usually), but lack the regularity of monospace. even with tab stops, the alignment of a table or such will
be thrown off when switching users or applications.
What i propose is a font in which each character is a small multiple of a given width. For example, slim characters like i, l, and single spaces get one unit. mid-sized lower-case characters get two. w, m, and most capital letters get three. Possibly M and W get four. Either way, height of the font is the equivalent of 4 units.
[link]
|
| |
Isn't this what actually happens? "Each character is a small multiple of a given width" just means that a character has width. Maybe I'm misunderstanding. |
|
| |
So the multi-spaced fonts would all conform to the same templates for i=1 space, a=2 spaces, and w=3 spaces etc. ? |
|
| |
That way, when you cycle between multispace fonts you do not alter the layout? |
|
| |
(Of course, if the unit used for space changes, you might skew a table) |
|
| |
What [angel] said:
i - 2px
f - 4px
n - 5px
m - 9px
|
|
| |
The difference between this font and the types [angel] and [wagster] are describing is that instead of characters having a large variety of widths, they only have a small number (3-4) of different widths, and all the larger widths are multiples of the smallest. And, since a single space falls into the smallest width category, tabular data can be aligned the same way it can in monospace fonts. |
|
| |
The title is a bit misleading, but I couldn't think of a latin prefix that meant "not many, but more than one" when I initially posted. |
|
| |
The Latin "pauco-" or Greek "oligo-" mean this. You mean integral multiples of the space available. Personally, i've never got used to proportional spacing and see it as unnecessary. Maybe i'm getting old. |
|
| |
The government should use such fonts when printing sensitive data; I don't know why it doesn't. When using a finely-proportionally-spaced font like Times Roman (the government standard) it's often possible to identify blacked-out words by carefully measuring the amount of space they take. There are some definite limits to this approach, but given a list of suspected words it may be possible to determine which one fits with much more specificity than if the government used a font with fewer character widths. |
|
| |
Alternatively, the government could use special software to slightly randomize word spacing. |
|
| |
This sounds useful, [nick]. I have often resorted to typing a space and then resizing the space character to be a larger or smaller font in order to nudge other characters over a bit. If the space's width were a greatest common divisor of the other widths, it would become a makeshift tab key. Good for beginners. |
|
| |
Isn't this why you use a table? |
|
| |