h a l f b a k e r yInexact change.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Everyone knows how illogical English is. Why not add at least a little bit of logic by revamping our number system completely, causing confusion to millions and meaning everyone has to reprint everything with numbers written out in words.
This new number system would in fact be so logical it would
be at the cutting edge of 21st-century advances in civilisation and confusion of large numbers of people. Like a sort of new wave of Imperial-Metric conversion.
So, without further ado, meet your new number system:
0-9 stay as they are
10: onety
11: onetyone
12: onetytwo
13: onetythree
14: onetyfour
15: onetyfive
16: onetysix
and so on...
20: twoty, etc..
30: threety..
and so on to ninetynine
100: onetyty...
1000: onetytyty...
and so on, ad infinitum
[link]
|
| |
My favorite new number? One titi two. |
|
| |
I remember being baffled by a tv program when I was in early school years. I had turned on half way through and I understood that they were discussing 'tens & units' but they called 35 "three-ty five" and 22 "twoty two". I found this most bizarre and changed channel to watch cartoons. |
|
| |
It is not just English that does this, Spanish does the same thing. |
|
| |
10 diez
11 once
12 doce
13 treinte
14 quatorce
15 quince
...
20 venta
21 venta-uno
|
|
| |
One problem with this is the large numbers involved in modern life. For example, when talking about the US budget, we would be talking about onetytytytytytytytytytytyty dollars. |
|
| |
Your childhood is evidently returning to haunt you. |
|
| |
//I remember being baffled by a tv program when I was in early school years. I had turned on half way through and I understood that they were discussing 'tens & units' but they called 35 "three-ty five" and 22 "twoty two". I found this most bizarre and changed channel to watch cartoons.// |
|
| |
I remember the same program. I'm sure it involved Johnny Ball. Sadly I wasn't allowed to switch over and watch cartoons since I was being forced to watch this in school. |
|
| |
How about harry-three or shirley-six or sammy-one? |
|
| |
// and so on, ad infinitum // |
|
| |
Anyway, sounds like it would be quicker to just recite the digits. "26" = "two six"; "1000" = "one oh oh oh". |
|
| |
I did at idea for ten hundred once. |
|
| |
It's somewhat interesting to compare the construction of ordinals in English with those in other languages. In English, all the ordinals end in 'th' except those whose last digit is 1, 2, or 3 *and* whose second-to-last digit is not 1. House number twenty-one is the twenty-first house. |
|
| |
If Google's translate function is accurate, German, Italian, and French all form that ordinal by appending the ordinal suffix to the number "21", while Spanish and Portuguese form it by combining "twentieth" and "first". Only English combines the cardinal "twenty" with the ordinal "first". |
|
| |
In onetytytyfourtytyninetytwo, Columbus sailed... oh never mind. |
|
| |
I've read a story by Borges "The analytical language of John Wilkins", I think. It was about an idea of making a logical language. |
|
| |
"li" would mean alive
"an" would mean animal
"tw" would mean having two legs. |
|
| |
Its nice - you know what does "halfbakphobia" mean, and i dont even have to explain it to you. why? because it is named in a meaningful way. |
|
| |
And the intresting part is that the children would learn the words intuitively, not bothering with the analysis. Once they are older, they can understand the deeper meaning. |
|
| |
But its too hard to change things.. not too practical |
|
| |
Imaginary numbers are good for EVERYTHING.
And if PI were three, then what are now integers would be irrational! |
|
| |
//Pi should equal three. and screw imaginary numbers. what are they good for?// |
|
| |
Counting imaginary sheep? |
|
| |
[NickTheGreat]// and so on, ad infinitum // |
|
| |
[phundug] You mean "ad infinityty" |
|
| |
Actually, more like "and so on, ad infinitytytytytytytytytyty...." |
|
| |
I have spent the last 3 (0011) (03) days on a PLC training course. I do not need this!.
If you did away with imaginary numbers then they would have to be re-invented for many applications.
BCD anyone? |
|
| |
I think [Nick] is close to a solution, but lost it at the tyty phase. Just have a different ending for different orders of magnatude. For example:
100 = onedo
1000 = onegu
10000 = oneba
12,489 = oneba twogu fourdo eighty nine
instead of:
12,489 = twelve thousand four hundred and eighty nine |
|
| |
[self-mumbling]
Well, what's wrong with just "one two four eight nine"? |
|
| |
Actually, it might be nicer to say it from right to left ("nine eight four two one"), so that the person writing it won't run out of paper... |
|
| |
Well, the problem either way is that the listener doesn't know up front what magnitude the whole number is. So "Twelve Thousand" or "Oneba" are better. |
|
| |
So maybe it's best to first state the total number of digits (perhaps alphabetically), hence "E one two four eight nine". [/self-mumbling] |
|
| |
Maybe it's best to do appreciate what we've already got. |
|
| |
Let's just write all our numbers and don't bother saying them. We'll all hold up cards and write on them. There's no confusion there. |
|
| |