h a l f b a k e r yGuitar Hero: 4'33"
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
LCD lie detecting glasses
The beauty of "clarity" in clear-on/ prism-off LCD glasses that 'colorfully' alerts to the presence of "Wolves In Sheeps' Clothing" | |
Conventional audio processing lie-detector technology is incorporated into the ear pieces of seemingly ordinary glasses. The processor detects variances in speech stress and recieves your companies voice thru a mic imbedded in the temple . At the touch of your remote, if detection of the parameters
associated with deception are detected, the processor signals the LCD lenses to "blink" off, causing a slight "halo" prismatic effect to be viewed thru the glasses and alerting viewer.
Inspired by dislike for scent of singed wolf tails
Infra-red lie detection
http://news.bbc.co....ci/tech/1739413.stm
Maybe if the glasses can "see" into the non-visual spectrum a bit . . . . [bristolz, Oct 05 2002]
BBC News: A brief history of lying
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1740746.stm
A follow up to the infra-red lie detection technology announcement. [bristolz, Oct 05 2002]
Euphemism Interpretion of a bristophemism
http://www.bankrate...sting/20010316a.asp
Just the first 4 lines bear relevance to the color invisioned. [hollajam, Oct 06 2002]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
<lighthearted> Thanks Bristol. |
|
| |
<meloncholoy>By your links added, I fear you may have failed to "see with clarity" the beauty of 'these' glasses.</meloncholoy> |
|
| |
My links are not indicators of my interpretation of the idea. Just links to possibly related things. |
|
| |
[bristolz]: My link added wasn't malisciously intended. Only the first four lines illuminate my satarical interpretation for linked technology that misses the point for this idea. |
|
| |
Actually, if you two have finished, bristolz's method of lie detection is supposed to be much more reliable than other available techniques. So, hollajam, bris has not only done you a favor by providing that link, her suggestion makes your hypothetical device more likely to work. |
|
| |
Personally, I would prefer a simple blinking red light on the person's nose to a halo. |
|
| |
DrCurry, thanks for your diplomacy. You and bristolz are correct that IFR technology is superior. Thank you, bris, for your links.
|
|
| |
For the purpose of these glasses IFR technology wouldn't be suitable though. I thought the difference in application was more obvious so I interpreted bris' links as a fair game play but undermining the idea since the links appeared with a fish bone. |
|
| |
An IFR cell would have to be constantly attenuated for gulps of coffee, judgment calls of someone blushing at a gentle joke, etc...
It would be arduous to keep it focused on target and "squelched" in sensitivity. IFR applications demand that the wearer postulate questions for yes /no answers possibly alerting the subject. Hypothetically a subject could "saunter" about the room eluding detection. And finally IFR cells are not as discreet as a tiny mic. |
|
| |
The beauty I was referring to is being able to regain sense of control for the wearer: |
|
| |
She toggled the switch 'off' to the LCD lenses. Just as she was coming to suspect, "A colorful liar he (she) is!", she thought with resolve. |
|
| |
Intuitively she moved, her strategy fluid and satisfying. Continuing on in the conversation, she began to entertain herself and build momentum. |
|
| |
"Toggle off--rainbow halo." "Toggle off -- Rainbow halo" |
|
| |
"Toggle--rainbow" Toggle--rainbow" |
|
| |
"Rainbow...rainbow... rainbow..." |
|
| |
The whimsy of it promoted her emotions and raised her confidence... |
|
| |