h a l f b a k e r yNot just a think tank. An entire army of think.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
They use kinetic capture mechanisms in watches all the time, so it should not be that heavy... |
|
|
True, but as photojunkie says, this would extend battery life rather than replace the battery. |
|
|
Or in the heels of your shoes. Or piezoelectric blah blah blah . . . . |
|
|
I was thinking of exactly the same thing yesterday, in work I have my mp3 player on a cord round my neck and I noticed it was swinging when I was walking round the warehouse. I thought it would be so good if this thing had a kinetic charger in it then it could be charging the battery whilst I'm walking, and with it being MP3 it doesn't use much more electric than a digital watch does, a solar powered MP3 player would probably also work fine. |
|
|
That Sandisk "Shaker" isn't shake-powered. It has a battery in it--the shaking controls the song mix. |
|
|
Ah! Right your are. I should have read a bit more: |
|
|
"After all, the idea of shaking something to mix up the contents in this case a music playlist is something even a baby can understand." |
|
|
Link title corrected. Also came across a study that seems to say that shaking isn't an ideal power source for an MP3 player; they favor cranking. [link] |
|
|
Should be quite bakeable, especially for flash-ram units as they use very little power. Hard-drives are a bit more power hungry. |
|
| |