h a l f b a k e r y[marked-for-tagline]
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This is almost baked as there is already kits out there
that
displays on your gun the amount of ammo you currently
have.
However one modification would make this practical for
integration with all usage scenario.
An epaper display.
Using LED display is all nice and cheap, however it
is
rather conspicuous to 'other people' you rather not be
seen
by.
Plus epaper is more durable and will not break via
shattering as much.
To keep things compact the display should consist of
two 7 seg display and a x10, x10^2,x10^3, etc...
(might as well, since we could use this display on various
models, e.g. your local chaingun)
if there is less than 100 rounds, just the two 7 seg
display is activated. If more than 100, then a "..." is
displayed alongside the numerical display for floating
point notation e.g. for "305" -> "30x10" or "9034" ->
"90x10^2"
hmmm... just scratch that... Use alphanumeric display
and just
display the whole dammn thing in scientific notation.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
I've found it pleasantly ironic that people will pay oogobs
of money for the luxury of not having to count. |
|
| |
In a gunfight, it's best to let the fight tell you when to reload, instead of trying to focus on a small display. A counter would just be a distraction. |
|
| |
I have never been in a gunfight without wishing this
sort of thing existed. |
|
| |
Ammo counters have been around for well over a century in loading systems that can accomodate them: Savage Model 1895/1899/99. High-tech counters are standard fare in video games, and show up in real guns as well. |
|
| |
much as I would like to see e-paper be more pervasive, the bit of the post that isn't the monthly gun/antigun rant is |
|
| |
"use a product for what it's designed for". |
|
| |
<troll> Everyone who's anti-gun should be rounded up by vigilantes and shot. Give 'em a taste of their own medicine. </troll> |
|
| |
It would be nice if it could be powered by each shot, and use no power between shots. Just make sure the computer isn't sentient, or its entire subjective existence would resemble being attached to a permanently firing machine gun. |
|
| |
spidermother, Jul 07 2013 |
|
| |
Can't be too hard to use a piezoelectric membrane to generate power. Now whether its enough energy to update the display is another thing. (Alternative is a coil and a magnet) |
|
| |
On a different note, how do you know that this universe's isn't being computed in some alien gun? |
|
| |
I think the way most videogames do it would be best - a small precise counter of exact ammo, but a big obvious RELOAD as you get down to 5% or whatever.
Alternatively, you could learn how heavy your gun is when it's full and (almost) empty. |
|
| |
Weighing your gun in your hands seems like the kind of thing
that's difficult in the middle of a gunfight. |
|
| |
//conspicuous to 'other people' you rather not be seen
by. |
|
| |
Could the ePaper devices on opponents' guns be linked
wirelessly? Then, if you were out of ammo, you could send a
message saying "Listen, Fritz, I'm out of ammo, but I had you
right in the crosshairs so please lie down and act dead." |
|
| |
I'm more worried about the Beeb story "Stephen
Barclay named new Brexit Secretary". |
|
| |
I mean, he can change it back to "Stephen Barclay" by
deed poll afterwards I s'pose. |
|
| |
The question is, *who* is the new Brexit Secretary that he
named? |
|
| |