h a l f b a k e r yVeni, vidi, teenie weenie yellow polka dot bikini.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
This seems like a high-bandwidth way to accomplish something for which you might be able to program the robot to do, straight up, in less time. + for that! |
|
|
Only gets a bun if you can come up with the robot
version of "Reefer Madness" (the 1936 version
thereof).. |
|
|
//you might be able to program the robot to do, straight up,
in less time.// Surprisingly enough it takes much less time to
train a general learning algorithm than to program individual
tasks. In the past these things weren't possible at all. |
|
|
I suppose if you're referring to a neural net type. But this seems beyond that in some fashion. |
|
|
My view is the opposite of [Rayford]'s. This seems
like a very inefficient process. |
|
|
Robots learning from existing videos is sort of OK,
because the videos already exist. Plus it's a clever
piece of AI to be able to learn from 'found' material.
But if you're
making the videos specially, I'm sure there are more
efficient ways - either teach the robot directly, or
create a standardised video with reference points,
barcodes or whatever the robot needs to learn from. |
|
|
It seems to me that you are asking the mechanics to help robots take the mechanics' jobs away from them.... |
|
|
I'm doing no such thing. I'm proposing that someone else use
someone elses money to pay mechanics to help robots to
take the mechanics' jobs away from them. |
|
|
Max, how was that opposite of my view? |
|
| |