h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
I find it quite annoying when I'm working somewhere new that when I email people with unusual names (ones that aren't in Word's dictionary, or in my custom dictionary) they come up as mis-spellings because they're not in the dictionary.
Future versions of software should (optionally) include
your contacts as allowable nouns.
[link]
|
| |
it should allow known companies too. |
|
| |
Plus "New Curse Words" via continually updated link to the halfbakery idea. |
|
| |
The more I think about this, the more I wonder why in the hell Word and Outlook don't do this already. After all, they come in the same box! Ah, well, there I go expecting things to make sense. |
|
| |
[contracts] - 'shithouse' is in popular usage in Australia, so probably feeds in from there. |
|
| |
it isn't global ? don't they both use MS Proof (i.e. custom.dic ? ) I was sure they did.. |
|
| |
certainly shouldn't (he says, thinking to himself, that that's almost certainly a good enough reason alone for them to have coded it that way).
Perhaps I should send you a copy of my custom.dictionary synchroniser.. |
|
| |
UnaBubba... I think he meant words that feature in dictionaries, but not your native language dictionary. In this day and age it's a complete nonsense to have to specify the language you're using.. just throw RAM and CPU at the problem and have full multilanguage checking. |
|
| |
I'm pretty sure I have this. |
|
| |
you mean it doesn't have a problem with you typing [....] ?
which program do you use ? |
|
| |
You can add anything you want to the dictionary but it would be very nice to have it look across contact fields if a user wanted it set that way. |
|
| |