h a l f b a k e r yRomantic, but doomed to fail.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I find it quite annoying when I'm working somewhere new that when I email people with unusual names (ones that aren't in Word's dictionary, or in my custom dictionary) they come up as mis-spellings because they're not in the dictionary.
Future versions of software should (optionally) include
your contacts as allowable nouns.
[link]
|
| |
it should allow known companies too. |
|
| |
Plus "New Curse Words" via continually updated link to the halfbakery idea. |
|
| |
The more I think about this, the more I wonder why in the hell Word and Outlook don't do this already. After all, they come in the same box! Ah, well, there I go expecting things to make sense. |
|
| |
[contracts] - 'shithouse' is in popular usage in Australia, so probably feeds in from there. |
|
| |
it isn't global ? don't they both use MS Proof (i.e. custom.dic ? ) I was sure they did.. |
|
| |
certainly shouldn't (he says, thinking to himself, that that's almost certainly a good enough reason alone for them to have coded it that way).
Perhaps I should send you a copy of my custom.dictionary synchroniser.. |
|
| |
UnaBubba... I think he meant words that feature in dictionaries, but not your native language dictionary. In this day and age it's a complete nonsense to have to specify the language you're using.. just throw RAM and CPU at the problem and have full multilanguage checking. |
|
| |
I'm pretty sure I have this. |
|
| |
you mean it doesn't have a problem with you typing [....] ?
which program do you use ? |
|
| |
You can add anything you want to the dictionary but it would be very nice to have it look across contact fields if a user wanted it set that way. |
|
| |