h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Here in Maine (and in several other places I can't immediately
name) there is a summer camp where Isreali and Palistinian teens
and pre-teens come together for six weeks every year to work
toward peace and religious tolerance in the Middle East while
being
rapidly exsanguinated by mosquitos
in the Middle of Nowhere. I
think this is great, and I've even donated a few handfuls of spare
change to the cause.
I think the same non-profit approach could be taken with those
who
refuse to work toward peace. It seems that a lot of people just
want to live peaceful and productive lives and would undoubtedly
appreciate a drastic reduction in the daily rate of exploding
buses,
so why not start a charity to offer those few who still want to
fight
low-cost airfare to pre-designated combat zones where they can
duke it out without hurting anyone but each other?
The Atacama is a lovely place to stage mass tank battles, and for
those who prefer the nasty carnage of city fighting, downtown
Detroit is available to rent or own. Those accustomed to the
desert
and looking for a change of pace might come up here to the
mountains and discover a common enemy in the form of neck-
deep
snow. There are plenty of places around the world in which to
safely conduct violent dispute, so let's all pitch in and move the
shooting away from the residential areas. Once the dust has
settled
and the bodies have been looted, whoever's left alive can return
home in comfort with the satisfaction of having accomplished
absolutely nothing, and if their bloodlust isn't completely sated,
they can always come back next year.
Group discount rates available. Book your reservations now!
[link]
|
| |
// There are plenty of places around the world in which to safely conduct violent dispute, // |
|
| |
Belgium was created purely so that major European powers could have somewhere to fight in without damaging anything important ... sometimes it spills over into france. Meh. |
|
| |
I have a feeling Detroit would win that round handily. |
|
| |
We'll hire actors to play the civilians in the urban combat
zones. A little bit of body armor and some paramedics on
standby should prove sufficient as safety measures. |
|
| |
// Unfortunately the idea misses the point of the fighting.
// |
|
| |
Actually, it's cleverly facetious bit of social commentary
playing upon that very aspect. These conflicts have been
going on for so long that _everybody_ is missing the point.
Find me one Palestinian freedom fighter or Hutu tribesman
who can clearly articulate the source of their aggression,
and I'll give you the nice half of Vancouver Island. |
|
| |
Well since jihad to go and bring it up, I'm not falling for that again. |
|
| |
I think a regular summer camp would go a long way towards solving this problem. |
|
| |
// the nice half of Vancouver Island // |
|
| |
That would be the part of Vancouver Island that isn't dull, rain-soaked, bedraggled, infested with mouth-breathing Canucks, and altogether rather less attractive than most of the Cascade range ? |
|
| |
^ OY! BORG! I've been to the U.K. and can affirm that Vancouver Island is much much nicer. (Well, the parts in the rain shadow anyway). |
|
| |
Superior force has always been the only claim to land. Power is only a part of force. |
|
| |
// How could the Israelis realistically be expected to take
these people seriously? // |
|
| |
For that matter, how can anyone? And
how can anyone take the Isrealis seriously when their own
nation is founded upon half-remembered dogma and
misguided British imperialism? When a conflict outlives the
generation that spawned it, the active combatants no
longer know what they're fighting for. Ask them and you'll
get plenty of answers, but no definition. At this point, it's
the Hatfields and the McCoys on a multinational scale. |
|
| |
I mean no offence to either party, though I'm probably
causing it. It simply takes an outsider to see that these
conflicts are downright stupid and that very few people
actually want to see them continued. Folks can live
together in social, racial, and religious harmony. With the
exception of West Virginia and Utah, the USA has been
doing it for the better part of forty years. |
|
| |
// if america is to be believed. // |
|
| |
We aren't, nor are we to be trusted. Unless, of course, you
mean Canada; they're entirely trustworthy, but just as
nearly unbelievable. |
|
| |
Mostly agreed. I am between 22 and 35 and do have the
whatever-it-takes to mostly take it all in, but the world is
a large,
confusing, and almost entirely valueless place that is
irrevocably at
odds with itself, and no matter how many like-minded
people try to point that out, just as many other like-
minded people who are of a different mind will tell them
how wrong they are and possible try to kill them. |
|
| |
Personally, I deal with it by having a sense of humor. |
|
| |
Great - another excuse for me to post my idea for a Live Firing, Suicide Bomber Practice Range. |
|
| |
//I am between 22 and 35// |
|
| |
// I'm surprised the media/people don't see
the demand for a new credible belief in
something. It's out there, its just the old
commandments / pillars of faith minus the
nonsense. // |
|
| |
Because the media, cheered on by the
general population baying from the sidelines,
are in the business of systematically trashing
any individual, institution or moral/ethical
system in order to build readership/viewing
figures, all justified by the fact that it's "in
the public interest". |
|
| |
No sense has to be made of anything. The world unfolds in a meaningless way partly through understandable discursion and partly through irrational action. Even that which can framed through discursion seems meaningless and irrational from another discursive system. The conflict is a material one, and the discursion that attempts to be reason and understanding is irrational. The only truth is that we constantly live in the materiality of the present. Any person will grow physically tired trying to tell himself a narrative story of immensity each passing day. Any person will grow tired and eventually become mad under such circumstances. That is the material relation of the discourse. This conflict in the religious storybook land is no different. There is a relatively straightforward material conflict of attacks and counterattacks, antagonisms and reactions, and simple demonstration of force and power. Power is partly discursive such as how things are framed, such as at the UN. Terrorism, Humanitarianism, Antisemitism etc. all hold discursive power. But those amount to little more ultimately than force mobilizations. Ask yourself how much discursive power each of those holds over you personally, and how much personal force you are willing to mobilize and in what way. What discourses frame your decision? |
|
| |
We're trapped and coerced to sell and comport ourselves in a world of other people's irrational demands and desires. |
|
| |
Most people will simply act in accordance with a view of the real world, whether or not they understand that they make it real. |
|
| |
I could ruin a small country but I couldn't be bothered. |
|
| |
He's taken some vilified and demonized things head on, including perceptions of himself, that's admirable. |
|
| |
[bigs], I meant 'valueless' in the sense of a society lacking
in the resolute identifiable values present in previous
generations. Just the same, valid point made and heard.
I'm not too flip a funnyman to mourn the passing of the
Greatest Generation. |
|
| |
Isn't that what Al Quaeda training camps are all about? |
|
| |