h a l f b a k e r yThe word "How?" springs to mind at this point.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
The practice of giving royal's names that other royals had is simply good for confusing people, and making history harder and boring than it already is. It also shows how un-original the British Royal Family is. My idea, is to either give new royal children different names, OR, and this would be the
simplest option, rename every member of the royal family, past present and future, Fred.
King Ralph
http://www.hollywoo...detail/movie/161160
Hollywood tried, in their own way, to address this issue. [bristolz, Feb 21 2002]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
We're trying to settle on a name for our imminently-pending daughter, who I'm sure will be royalty for at least a while. Like the royals to whom you refer, we've decided to use family names. Unlike them, though, we've decided to use names from *other* people's families. |
|
| |
Why? I mean, what's the idea here? If tradition isn't important, why keep the royal family at all? |
|
| |
What about King Alfred The Great? Actually, going back to pre-1066 Old English names might be cool. If only the queen had called her children Ethelred, Cnut, Uthur and Guinevere. |
|
| |
I reckon Beatrice and Eugenie are old-school enough! |
|
| |
Charles does not intend being King Charles (something to do with heads and choppers I believe) he is planning to be King Robbie or something! |
|
| |
I dunno about their names, but if you changed their titles to plain Mr, Mrs or Miss then I'd be a lot happier.
beauxeault, good luck with the birthing! How about belleaux as a name? It's all that she'll be doing for the first few months anyway! |
|
| |
PeterSealy: I sorta covered this when i posted my common Royal Family idea. Shortening their names to Liz, Phil, Chaz, Ed, Andy, and the future king, Prince Billy. |
|
| |
So if they're all called Fred, what are we on now? Fred LXVIII ? |
|
| |
............and the Queens? let them be Brenda! |
|
| |
Naming someone Cnut could lead to some awful typographical errors... |
|
| |
Actually, after trailing through the history books, i discovered that britain almost had a King Fred. George the seconds first born son was called Fred, but unfortunatly he got hit by a cricket ball and died beforeGeorge the second did. So we were this close||. |
|
| |