h a l f b a k e r yContrary to popular belief
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
Bonus points for "Kechup" avoiding the spelling issue
altogether. |
|
| |
So is this a container, with a base, middle section, upper
section then lid? So that you can use the upper region, remove
a section of jar, then reassemble as a smaller jar? Am I getting
that right? |
|
| |
It's a bottle with a top side and bottom side that can be
screwed apart so you can get all the product out. |
|
| |
Why not have a container that is assembled from a stack of screwed-together rings, plus a top and bottom cap ? |
|
| |
As each "level" of the container is emptied, that segment is unscrewed and discarded (or cleaned and stored). At the end, only the top, bottom, and one ring remain. |
|
| |
The user can then reassemble containers of arbitrarily large size by simply screwing multiple intermediate rings together to create anything from an low, flat, single-ring container to an enormously tall cylinder, limited only by the mechanical strength of the material it's made from. |
|
| |
I hope this bottle isn't glass. |
|
| |
People in glass bottles don't go home. |
|
| |
Where do you keep them, then? |
|
| |
//Why not have a container that is assembled from a stack of screwed-together rings, plus a top and bottom cap ?// |
|
| |
If the stack is sufficiently long you wouldn't need the end caps |
|
| |