h a l f b a k e r yThis product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Groundhog day is a film where a weather presenter repeats the same day until he finally manages to attract his co-host[1].
He apparently spends a lot of days in various persuits like learning to play the piano, seducing women, killing himself and 6 months solid throwing cards into a hat.
I think
there's potential for the film to be expanded with more wild adventures which could be attempted. This new film would therefore be in a novel state; it would not be a sequel, a prequel, a remake, or even a retelling of the same events from a different perspective. Since the scenes would take place between the days shown in the previous film, I suggest that it would be an intervel.
[1] I think he was lucky that the time-loop ended that day, for no obvious reason. What would he have done if he'd managed that then the day had repeated again?
IMDB
http://uk.imdb.com/...48/trivia?tr0657131
'Groundhog Day' and 'The Gay Science' [nineteenthly, Jan 14 2011]
[link]
|
| |
//What would he have done// Repeated his success until he
grew bored with her. Eventually, everything she said, every
facial expression, her reaction to everything he could say or
do to her -- would be completely predictable to him.
Ghastly.
I rather like that, as an alternative, tragic denouement. Not
exactly box
office, though. ([+]) |
|
| |
It would be "In Camera". That's particularly interesting because the successful version is Nietzschean but the unsuccessful one would be Sartrean. |
|
| |
I honestly think you've done something really profound with this idea, [Loris]. |
|
| |
Only you and only here can we manage philosophy conversation out of a Bill Murray movie. |
|
| |
I'm hard pressed to think of any film which isn't fertile ground for philosophy. In this case, for what it's worth, there's a claim on IMDB that the film is inspired by Nietzsches Eternal Recurrence, as in 'Frohliche Wissenschaft'. |
|
| |
//Repeated his success until he grew bored with her.
Eventually, everything she said, every facial expression, her
reaction to everything he could say or do to her -- would be
completely predictable to him// |
|
| |
This could easily enter the horror genre. |
|
| |