h a l f b a k e r yFewer ducks than estimates indicate.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This would allow you to see not only when people are
stopping, but when they're accelerating as well.
When just cruising it would just be off like a regular brake
light. I'm not sure if this would be useful or not.
Click the + button if you like this idea.
Click the - button if you do not.
You
may also post any comments or questions using the
annotation feature.
Thank you.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Not useful for those with red/green colorblindness. |
|
| |
Probably this would be left behind when the cars get networked. You may not know but your car will. |
|
| |
Just have a dash range finder, if your still keen. |
|
| |
One [+] but how about when they are reversing? |
|
| |
I dunno, [doc]. If a car ahead is braking, I need to
know about it. If they're accelerating, I only need to
know about if they have, for example, kidnapped my
dog and I am in hot pursuit. |
|
| |
Given that the latter is unlikely to happen (our dog is
very grumpy and remarkably stupid; I'd ask them for
ransom to take it back), I'm not sure it's worth adding
to the optical noise. |
|
| |
//our dog is very grumpy and remarkably stupid// |
|
| |
It's not just your dog Max, all dogs are stupid. As I've said
before: If the forehead's a slope, the critter's a dope. |
|
| |
And yes 8, cats are just as stupid. (refer to maxim above) |
|
| |
//If the forehead's a slope, the critter's a dope.// I'm
not going to tell the intercalary you said that, [doc]. |
|
| |
(I'll pretend I understood that so I don't look stupid.) |
|
| |
Yes, I was just thinking that. |
|
| |
(Pretty cool that with these new browsers, somebody told me
that
parenthesis make words invisible to others, so I can say
whatever I want and nobody else will see it. Ha ha! Suckers.) |
|
| |
[little does the fool know that the brackets have to
be square!] |
|
| |
At traffic lights, knowing the car infront's accceleration means, as a driver, you can stay closer and allow more people behind through. On jammed motorways, an indication of acceleration might make for a more gentle traffic waveform. |
|
| |
Needs be hooked to tire rotation: acceleration green, deceleration red, reverse white... regardless of driver input. |
|
| |
// I'm not going to tell the intercalary you said that // |
|
| |
This particular iWord must be a Britishism, unknown to
Americans. Well, unknown to me anyway. |
|
| |
February 29 is an intercalary day. Leap year is an intercalary
year. Informing the intercalary of something.... nope, doesn't
scan. |
|
| |
^ I don't see your point. In that case, normally there would be a red light followed by nothing when he takes his foot off the brake and steps on the gas. In the case of a red/green/white indicator, there'd be nothing when his foot comes off the gas, then green when it hits the gas (and the wheels' rotational speed increases). |
|
| |
Oh, driver's input is also signalled so you can tap the brakes as a headsup. |
|
| |
Nice idea, but this would never work - as you
accelerate, the green light would become red-shifted
from the perspective of the person behind you and
they would just see a murky brown light. |
|
| |