h a l f b a k e r yYou gonna finish that?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
These devices are called "Electrostatic Precipitators". How large would the EP have to be to cover L.A.? What impurities would they remove from car exhausts? |
|
|
It Would be more efficient to process the exhaust fumes *before* they enter the air, so I would prefer that they be fitted into the exhaust system of each vehicle. It would be interesting to see how many extra particulates this technology would remove.. |
|
|
So kind of like commercial precipitators, but overpriced and ineffective? I think you could accomplish the same thing by simply putting a big sign on a skyscraper that says "Ionic Breeze" and charging the local government a vast quantity of money |
|
|
For those who haven't been paying attention, ionic breeze filters actually: |
|
|
a) are completely ineffective (per Consumer Reports tests).
b) throw off ozone, which is poisonous in the same way as carbon monoxide (that's the distinctive smell down-wind of these things and some laser printers). |
|
|
Even if it worked in the first place, I doubt the citizens of Los Angeles would be grateful if you added even more ozone to their air. |
|
|
//ozone, which is poisonous in the same way as carbon monoxide // Is that true [DrC]? Carbon monoxide is toxic because it binds with haemoglobin more strongly than oxygen, but ozone *is* oxygen, abeit more reactive than O2. I thought the main danger was from lung tissue damage. |
|
| |