h a l f b a k e r yNaturally, seismology provides the answer.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
It's always George Bush's axis, as if he was the one in charge. The idea is to put him in charge of a small dictatorship and have him try to manage a pathetic economy, stay in power by killing rivals/rigging elections, negotiate with the UN and stave of serious consequences... The hope is that looking
at the problem from the other side may allow a previously unnoticed peaceful solution to be found...
Needless to say, Saddam doesn't get to be the president of the USA...
[link]
|
| |
How is this different from Bush's present regime (apart from the words "small" and, arguably, "dictatorship")? |
|
| |
Basically he wouldn't have the military or economic power to make other countries do what he wanted... he'd have to try diplomacy or something... |
|
| |
If GWB hadn't already been governor of Texas and executive in a major oil/gas exploration company, this would seem like an inspired idea. But he's been there and done that. And even though you and I may not care for his style, the administrative work seems to be getting done. |
|
| |
Perhaps public service exams should be required of elected officals. |
|
| |
what can I say, the guy is a moron. |
|
| |
I agree with LordWatson most elected officals need to have some sort of intelligence to do their job proberly. Yes Mr. Bush is a moron and for that matter so is Tony Blair for agreeing to help him. My actual opinions contain words not suitable for this annotation. |
|
| |
Erm, a bit late in the day to be adding this, but an axis is a straight line, so no way to get it to go through Iran, North Korea and Disneyland. |
|
| |
Maybe not ... after all, a satellite in free-fall effectively moves in a "straight" line, and if it was in a polar orbit as the planet rotates below it those places would sucessively come under its track without any course corrections. |
|
| |
If spacetime is curved how does a satellite move in a straight line? |
|
| |
That's true, we've seen the videos on YouTube. |
|
| |
The ones with the trampolines and the hedges are just as funny, too. |
|
| |
//If spacetime is curved how does a satellite move in a straight line? |
|
| |
While to the satellite it might look like a straight line, to everyone else in the universe it's a circle or ellipse or whatever, ergo it can't be an axis. |
|
| |
While I'm on the subject less spikey satellites would be good, less chance of tearing the rubber sheet. Doesn't bear thinking about..<shudders> |
|
| |