h a l f b a k e r yWhat was the question again?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
How could you pick up the cup if it is rendered immobile? |
|
|
It would be rendered immobile to the point where it won't fall or spill if it's jostled around, but if you pull it upwards it disengages the button which disengages the clamps |
|
|
my friend's mom has a older caravan (new body style) and the cup holders adjust to different cup sizes with a ratching type mechanism |
|
|
Must say that the author describes the parts *and* the sum of them quite nicely. Ratchet-types, as dickity alludes to, are 'baked - on one plane. Were this idea able to meet and greet containers on 2 levels - hi and lo - that'd be as stable as an F-car - suspension so tight, it's riding on rails, as it were. |
|
|
I've driven a car where the emergency (parking) brake was both engaged and disengaged by pressing on the same pedal, I assume through some ratcheting mechanism. One press engage-- another press disengage. |
|
|
Perhaps something like this could be worked into this cupholder design. Insert the cup, it locks into place on the sides and top, press down a bit (hard enough that it couldn't happen accidentally) and the locking mechanism springs out of the way. |
|
|
Pressing down is no good if you're using a styrofoam or paper cup. |
|
|
\\Pressing down is no good if you're using a styrofoam or paper cup.// |
|
|
Thats why there's another button to lock it in without pressing down. |
|
|
For more reliable and simple use I like [swamilad]'s of one-press engage-disengage. I'll incorporate that if you don't mind. |
|
| |