Failure Point.

Because trumping can always be done on complex situations, the "should use", is always the moral question.**

I am thinking a movie about a bank robbery and the few individuals' personal reasons to be involved. This film would involve scenes showing the financial complexities of generating a profit in the bank, strains on individuals and the housing /rental scene. Ultimately a connection with the personal point of view of the public is crucial for this film.

All of the bank robbers have various reasons but one has the moral goal of obtaining records of bank dealings, exposing a deeper more wide spread societal theft. Of course, other paths to exposure are hinted at. While being in the moral right, the fallout from getting the records, in a robbery situation, allows all those other reasons a free pass.

The robbery, although tense, goes flawlessly*. As time goes by the cost of an over injection of cash in the wrong places causes death and pain. Only one of the individuals gets above water and gets their family to a better place. A little dread and thrill could be played out as the robbery participants find out about the impending moral issue coming to light .Finally our moral trumper goes public with the records and all the participants*** stories end up in court. A twist is found that the financial logic of the whistle blower is completely wrong but does expose hints to a forensic accountant that something is very rotten.

Ultimately, people coming out from the movie are going to be deciding whether robbery was right or cost was too high. Is a robbery ever in the right, does the means justify the ends?

*** was partiocipants ** Unless the the situation has left reality. * A death might be needed to balance the societal harm from the bank.