h a l f b a k e r yI think this would be a great thing to not do.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Many animals form swarms or flocks - starlings, bees,
locusts and ants are just a few of the four examples I can
think of.
On an apparently unrelated note, it is possible to build
battery-powered ion guns which will spray out either
positive or negative ions, leaving themselves (and
whatever
they are attached to) with a net negative or
positive charge, respectively.
What I propose (for reasons which will become apparent in
the fullness of due course*), is to fit each member of a
flock or swarm with such an ion gun. Half the members of
the flock will carry guns of one polarity, half the other.
The result will be a flock (or swarm) consisting of
individuals with two different net charges.
If two individuals of the same charge approach eachother,
they will experience a slight repulsion. But if two
individuals of opposite charge get too close, they will
experience a short, painful zap as the charge sparks
between them.
After a learning phase, this should result in entirely new
flock dynamics, designed to minimize the frequency of
zapping.
*not yet.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
//it is possible to build battery-powered ion guns |
|
| |
+ before reading. Sounds great. |
|
| |
- after reading. Sounds terrible. |
|
| |
I think all the little rubber boots needed to
prevent leakage of the charge could be
awkward. |
|
| |
// little rubber boots needed to prevent leakage of
the charge// We'll start with things that fly. |
|
| |
Traffic cones wouldn't need to fly. |
|
| |