h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Imagine the current electric
motor assembly with its coil and
brushes.
Now take the copper coil and its
magnets, and extend this ring
through repetition into a belt.
Instead of a single spindle,
there are two, one at each end
of this conveyor shaped motor.
The centrifugal force needed
to
maintain the rotation of the
motor would come from a flywheel
mounted flat above or below the
motor via a transfer gear of
some kind.
This might allow for the
equivalent of two larger motors
in one flatly mounted package
unless my idea is really really
bad and I am
missing/forgetting/not knowing
something.
Linear Motor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_motor [MisterQED, Sep 20 2008]
[link]
|
|
So you are rolling out a rotary electric motor to make a linear motor. See link and then you are wrapping a belt around it like a tank tread. Belts, especially belts with any mass have problems with tight radius turns, centripetal force and all so it can't go too fast, but I don't see how you have added much to the linear motor idea. |
|
|
The main difference between a
linear motor and this one is
that a linear motor is linear,
this one is not. It is
rotational. |
|
|
I figured the two spindles
poles would have offset
timing, simulating the
spinning of one spindle with
both poles. |
|
|
The flywheel is geared to the
two spindles to help keep it
going. |
|
|
Now my design has two spindles
and is elongated, and the why
is to allow the packaging of a
very very large coil in
relation to its round
counterpart. In height that
is. |
|
|
One spindle could power, say,
the front wheels of a car, and
the rear spindle could power,
say, the rear wheels of a car. |
|
| |