h a l f b a k e r yClearly this is a metaphor for something.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
When you're at a teller's window and you want to get cash back from a deposit, you have to dig out your wallet and present a photo ID to confirm that you are, indeed, you. That seems silly.
Instead, why not mount a small mirror on each teller's wicket? When a customer is asked to identify him- or
herself, they can simply look in the mirror and say, "Yes, that's me."
Sure, we may occasionally find it a bit harder to identify ourselves---say, after night of hard partying, or following cosmetic surgery. At those times, the photo ID would still be available. Usually, though, self-identification is a quick and effortless process that shouldn't have to hold up the queue.
[link]
|
| |
You're not required to identify yourself unless you give my idea a fishbone. |
|
| |
Hmm. Seems to me that there is a security flaw in this idea. |
|
| |
There might be some identity theft, whereby the mirror is maliciously replaced with a picture portrait of [DrCurry]. |
|
| |
Bank teller: Is this you?
[Ander]: Ye.....er no, that's no me.
Bank teller: Sorry sir, you have failed authorisation. I cannot allow this transaction to continue. Goodbye. |
|
| |
Bank teller: Is this you?
[DrCurry]: Why yes. Noone else could be so handsome.
(smug look over at [Ander] being escorted out by security.) |
|
| |
That happened to me. I signed both the receipt and the card at a gas station, and the teller then checked them to see if they matched. |
|
| |
I'm beginning to think that you guys don't deserve me. |
|
| |
//following cosmetic surgery...the photo ID would still be available//
I think that you are arguing against yourself there. |
|
| |