h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
When you're at a teller's window and you want to get cash back from a deposit, you have to dig out your wallet and present a photo ID to confirm that you are, indeed, you. That seems silly.
Instead, why not mount a small mirror on each teller's wicket? When a customer is asked to identify him- or
herself, they can simply look in the mirror and say, "Yes, that's me."
Sure, we may occasionally find it a bit harder to identify ourselves---say, after night of hard partying, or following cosmetic surgery. At those times, the photo ID would still be available. Usually, though, self-identification is a quick and effortless process that shouldn't have to hold up the queue.
[link]
|
| |
You're not required to identify yourself unless you give my idea a fishbone. |
|
| |
Hmm. Seems to me that there is a security flaw in this idea. |
|
| |
There might be some identity theft, whereby the mirror is maliciously replaced with a picture portrait of [DrCurry]. |
|
| |
Bank teller: Is this you?
[Ander]: Ye.....er no, that's no me.
Bank teller: Sorry sir, you have failed authorisation. I cannot allow this transaction to continue. Goodbye. |
|
| |
Bank teller: Is this you?
[DrCurry]: Why yes. Noone else could be so handsome.
(smug look over at [Ander] being escorted out by security.) |
|
| |
That happened to me. I signed both the receipt and the card at a gas station, and the teller then checked them to see if they matched. |
|
| |
I'm beginning to think that you guys don't deserve me. |
|
| |
//following cosmetic surgery...the photo ID would still be available//
I think that you are arguing against yourself there. |
|
| |