h a l f b a k e r ySee website for details.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Listen up G! It aint no good ideas to go callin' yo-bakers buttheads aw-right home-dog? |
|
|
//All you bowlers that suck at math// Well, if you're not adding nombers, math is a lot easier. |
|
|
Oh, come on. Grammar school kids keep score. I did a little. My brothers who weren't exactly math wizards either, also kept score at your age. |
|
|
Having said that, your way does seem a little simpler though - none of that "spare working" and "strike working" nonsense. |
|
|
This is an interesting way to make scoring more standard, but the old way takes your skill level into consideration, whereas this way rewards you for lucky strikes and spares. I could see this as perhaps a kiddie scoring system, to even things out when playing with adults...kind of how bumper bowling helps kids get more points. |
|
|
If they'd just put those gutters in the middle, it'd be a lot easier. |
|
|
Or used 3 foot wide rollers instead of balls. |
|
|
I too enjoy bowling but am utterly crap at it. It doesn't matter how much you tinker with the scoring system, it'll not do me any good - unless you start awarding points for missing the pins altogether. |
|
|
He's working on a croissant
|
|
|
mm. He's got action on that ball, but it remains to be seen if the seasoned players on this circuit will step up the pace or reserve for a more conservative 15 frames. The nights aren't getting any shorter. |
|
|
Candlepin bowling is much better. |
|
|
The old (REEEEEEALLY OLD) RCA video game system had a bowling game that awarded 15 for a spare and 20 for a strike. On the other hand, even many mechanical arcade "bowling machines" were able to properly handle the strike-working and spare-working concepts; they're really not that hard. |
|
| |