h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
The technology is not readily invertable. If I remeber correctly, there is a normal fan in the base. This produces air that is blown out the ring, entraining air as it passes through the ring, producing a greater total volume. (along with a couple of other effects) None of this works in reverse. |
|
|
As [MechE] said, it isn't reversible. There's a rapidly-turning centrifugal impeller in the base, that feeds high-pressure air up into the ring, and a little slot all around the ring that the high-pressure air shoots out of, aiming into the ring. That drags other air through the ring with it, and that drags air from around the fan with it, which makes a lot of slower-moving air to fan your face. All from a snarly little high pressure "fan". |
|
|
Trying to run that backward would be like sticking a shower nozzle out in the rain and expecting to fill your water tower. |
|
|
You might be able to set up a giant Dyson fan ring in the wind, and use it to suck air out of a tube, like a venturi, but that isn't an exact reversal and might not be efficient use of the wind area. |
|
|
There are some propellors with rapidly-rotating inner rings, by the way. One is used on a submersible vehicle. |
|
|
Dang! Thanks for the anno's. I never got around to looking up
how the fan worked. I was hoping it was something more than
what it is, I reckon. |
|
|
Perhaps a big funnel with a small turbine at the back could work? The dyson method appears to be a complicated way of folding the funnel and hiding the fan. |
|
|
I want one, mostly to throw paper aeroplanes through. |
|
| |