h a l f b a k e r yThese statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
The technology is not readily invertable. If I remeber correctly, there is a normal fan in the base. This produces air that is blown out the ring, entraining air as it passes through the ring, producing a greater total volume. (along with a couple of other effects) None of this works in reverse. |
|
|
As [MechE] said, it isn't reversible. There's a rapidly-turning centrifugal impeller in the base, that feeds high-pressure air up into the ring, and a little slot all around the ring that the high-pressure air shoots out of, aiming into the ring. That drags other air through the ring with it, and that drags air from around the fan with it, which makes a lot of slower-moving air to fan your face. All from a snarly little high pressure "fan". |
|
|
Trying to run that backward would be like sticking a shower nozzle out in the rain and expecting to fill your water tower. |
|
|
You might be able to set up a giant Dyson fan ring in the wind, and use it to suck air out of a tube, like a venturi, but that isn't an exact reversal and might not be efficient use of the wind area. |
|
|
There are some propellors with rapidly-rotating inner rings, by the way. One is used on a submersible vehicle. |
|
|
Dang! Thanks for the anno's. I never got around to looking up
how the fan worked. I was hoping it was something more than
what it is, I reckon. |
|
|
Perhaps a big funnel with a small turbine at the back could work? The dyson method appears to be a complicated way of folding the funnel and hiding the fan. |
|
|
I want one, mostly to throw paper aeroplanes through. |
|
| |