h a l f b a k e r yGetting blown into traffic is never fun.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
My younger daughter proposes this rule change to the game of draughts (U.S.-checkers).
If one (or more) of your pieces has become a king (i.e., has reached the far row and been doubled up to indicate that it can now move backward as well as forward)
then, *instead of* making a normal move,
you may transfer that doubling-up piece (that marks a king) to another of your pieces which is not already a king, and which may have a greater need for it.
Of course, you can always reverse this transfer on a later turn.
The chess equivalent
Usurp_20Chess
Makes for an interesting variant. [theleopard, Dec 01 2008]
[link]
|
| |
I'd call it a coup d'etat, rather than an abdication, and the piece that reached the other side must be removed from the board. Power is rarely transferred peacefully in a monarchy with a living ex-sovereign. |
|
| |
//It could interfere too much with the 'must take' rule, which is often used to good effect to remove opponents' newly crowned kings.// |
|
| |
Just say that if you are in a 'must take' situation, you can't abdicate that turn. |
|
| |
There should also be a rule along the lines of 'if you abdicate on one turn, you are obliged to move a piece, rather than abdicate again, on the next turn' to prevent someone drawing by abdicating turn after turn if they have one king and one normal pieces left. |
|
| |
[+] for the same reasons as [boysparks] |
|
| |
any rule a kid thinks up for an old game is reason for joy |
|
| |
/any rule a kid thinks up for an old game is reason for joy/ |
|
| |
right on pashute! And it is joy on many levels: for what was, what is and what promises to be. |
|
| |
She's just had her first paper published in Nature. I know this isn't really the right place to post this sort of boasting, but I'm very proud of her. |
|
| |