h a l f b a k e r yContrary to popular belief
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I haven't heard of anything like this but it's simple enough that it seems like if it could be done easily it would have already... The idea is to control electric power efficiently by having a tube filled with a conductive gas such as mercury vapor used in fluorescent lighting, that can be varied in
pressure producing different resistances, which could be used as the transmission in an electric car, etc. Has this been done before?
Explanation of PWM motor control
http://www.4qdtec.com/pwm-01.html A much better solution [scad mientist, Oct 04 2004]
[link]
|
|
how would this be efficient? you're still controlling current via variable resistance, thereby turning excess power into heat. |
|
|
My thought was that the efficiency would be high because the resistance would be caused by the vacuum, therefor not losing the unswitched power as heat like a variable resistor |
|
|
I like the automated switching solutions. While your idea has merit, [tabarin], on the one hand I think this is not an appropriate use of pressure switches for your current source, and on the other hand it seems unresponsive and inefficient. |
|
|
Perhaps if you use a.c. then the arc will only re-strike when the appropriate voltage is reached, thereby producing a PWM type result. |
|
|
Of course that would just be phase angle control, and that is probably easier to do with triacs. |
|
|
Argh ... Brain hurts ...must ....find... childish and immature... halfbakery ideas. |
|
|
Allen Bradley was selling "Compression Rheostats" back in 1903 to do this. Used plates of carbon instead of gas though, and was used to control electric crane motors. |
|
|
//the resistance would be caused by the vacuum, therefor not losing the unswitched power as heat// |
|
|
Due to conservation of energy, the lost power has to go somewhere, and due to the laws of thermodynamics, it ends up appearing as heat at some point. |
|
|
PWM systems avoid this by switching the resistance rapidly on and off. Either R is very small, in which case P is very small (I^2 * R) or R is very large, making P very small (V^2 / R). PWM systems only get warm during the very, very brief moment that the resistance is changing - this is what makes them efficient. |
|
|
My vote is for PWM. "They" solved the efficient DC motor control issue ages ago with PWM. It got even better with the advent of MOSFET's - which also make it compact. |
|
|
Also pretty good for dimming DC lights <LED only>. Get the frequency above a few kHz and it's perfect. |
|
| |