h a l f b a k e r yNot just a think tank. An entire army of think.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
although the printer might be shorter it's still going to be bulky. I think it would be better to focus on the bulkiness and get rid of some of the moving parts instead. For example a full page width print head; then you'd only need a motor to feed the paper through. |
|
|
heheh neat.... but why 4x4x6" ? 8.5/pi isn't even 3" and you only need enough depth for the rollers... say an inch... for that matter you could make a spiral and have an 1x1x1" printer... whatever... [+] |
|
|
The printer size problem was comprehensively solved by the RMP [link] |
|
| |