h a l f b a k e r yRenovating the wheel
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
How long would a half wavelength aerial be? (I suspect really short), and would it need several in parallel (could it be done this way)? Or should it be parabolic (direction wouldn't matter, I expect)? |
|
| |
Finally, is there enough field strength to do anything useful? |
|
| |
A parabolic reflector would be nearly useless since the purpose of such a thing is usually to concentrate radiant flux from a distant object assumed to be a point. Here, you'd be able to collect the energy from all directions. |
|
| |
The field strength would be very low, yes, but it's finite, and it's from a free energy source. Unlike conventional energy sources that have fuel costs, you really need to think in terms of how you could scale a large array of collectors and how much it would all cost you. You need to stop thinking in terms of efficiency and start thinking in terms of watts per investment dollar and maintenance dollar; in the case of something like this, it will probably work out to be pretty cheap I suppose. Whether it's competitive with legacy energy sources remains uncalculated on my desk. |
|
| |
I actually was thinking about this the other day as a power system for deep space satellites. |
|
| |
Don't think it would compete with solar power. It does have the small advantage of working at night. But solar panel + battery would still beat it. And solar panel isn't all that good in terms of bang/buck. |
|
| |
I'm going to have to bone this. It's a neat idea but I have serious doubts about getting enough power to beat existing technology. |
|
| |
I am all for casimir effect diodes for rectifying space time energy. |
|
| |
A tunnel diode for energy harvesting would easily pick up that
frequency. |
|
| |
A tunnel diode for energy harvesting would easily pick up that
frequency. |
|
| |