h a l f b a k e r yCeci n'est pas une idée.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Law 1: Since all men are not created equal, something must be done. This is the Law of Order.
(OK, the real first law is the Law of Form: Draw a Distinction. But politicswise,...)— | rfalv,
Dec 19 2000, last modified Dec 23 2000 |
|
|
|
I'm not sure I completely understand this idea...
Also (belated) welcome to the Halfbakery! |
|
|
Yes, welcome, [rfalv]. [rfalv]?? [rfalv]???? |
|
|
Tsk. Bloody typical - turns up, posts and then buggers off in the intervening 17 years. |
|
|
I wonder if the HB should have a contract, similar to a mobile phone contract, but perhaps slightly longer? We could charge a massive penalty if 'bakers want to leave early. |
|
|
Well, at least they bothered to anno on a dozen ideas before haring off. |
|
|
I like the concept of sorting out legislature in this manner, but it needs to be even more complex. |
|
|
Let's say you favor the death penalty for a given crime - you name goes on a list, and when it's your turn you will be required to execute a convicted offender. |
|
|
Or perhaps you favor imprisonment for some minor issue - at some point you will be required to supervise a work crew comprised of offenders regarding that offense. |
|
|
So, if I vote for funding for a Mars mission, do I get a ticket to go? |
|
|
// when it's your turn you will be required to execute a convicted offender. // |
|
|
<jumps up and down waving arms> |
|
|
If we pay, can we jump the queue ? Please ? PLEEEEASE ? |
|
|
Can we choose the method ? We will pay extra for that .... |
|
|
Everyone's guilty of something... is it really necessary to go through all that stupid, expensive, bureaucratic rigmarole ? Even if they're not technically guilty of anything, they're probably thinking of doing something wrong, and certainly capable ... best to err on the safe side ? |
|
| |